Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: created new pipeline for feat/sparrow-refactoring branch [] #744

Merged

Conversation

pratikshinde590
Copy link
Contributor

@pratikshinde590 pratikshinde590 commented Apr 12, 2024

Description

Please do not leave this blank

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ• Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ“ Documentation Update
  • 🎨 Style
  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Code Refactor
  • πŸ”₯ Performance Improvements
  • βœ… Test
  • πŸ€– Build

Have you tested locally?

  • πŸ‘ yes
  • πŸ™… no, because I am lazy

Added tests?

  • πŸ‘ yes
  • πŸ™… no, because they aren't needed
  • πŸ™‹ no, because I need help

Added to documentation?

  • πŸ“œ README.md

Any Known issue?

Related Story, task & Documents?

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

Please attach the issue link

1 similar comment
@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

Please attach the issue link

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

SonarQube Quality Gate Result

Metric Status Value Error Threshold
New reliability rating βœ… OK 1 > 1
New security rating βœ… OK 1 > 1
New maintainability rating βœ… OK 1 > 1

View on SonarQube

updated: 4/12/2024, 07:26:55 (UTC+0)

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

Please attach the issue link

@punitkashyup punitkashyup merged commit e7e4517 into feat/sparrow-refactoring Apr 16, 2024
3 of 7 checks passed
@punitkashyup punitkashyup deleted the pratik/feat-sparrow-refactoring branch April 16, 2024 05:02
@pratikshinde590
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸŽ‰ This PR is included in version 1.3.0 πŸŽ‰

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot πŸ“¦πŸš€

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants