You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ If you wonder how to interpret these findings in light of Marek, T-C et al.'s re
| Kong XZ., et al. | Scanning reproducible brain-wide associations: sample size is all you need? |[Psychoradiology](https://academic.oup.com/psyrad/article/2/3/67/6758324)|
| J. Goltermann, et al. | Cross-validation for the estimation of effect size generalizability in mass-univariate brain-wide association studies |[BioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.29.534696v1.abstract)|
| Kang K., et al. | Study design features that improve effect sizes in cross-sectional and longitudinal brain-wide association studies |[BioRxiv](https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542742)|
| Makowski C., et al. | Reports of the death of brain-behavior associations have been greatly exaggerated |[BioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.16.545340v1)|