Improve y-006 and y-013

[vr8hub]

Per the discussion. I added an additional negative lookahead for the ellipsis, ran another test on the entire corpus, and the only differences were the ones with the ellipses. So, no false positives that I can see.

This will leave us with 86 works in the corpus that now have y-006 and/or y-013 errors (total of 98 errors). Do you want me to send a message to the editors to ask if they can help whittle it down? If so, and we find the text isn't a transcription error, would you consider fixing whatever is wrong Editorial? (It's going to be either adding a rsquo if the quote is valid, or reversing the rsquo if it's an elided word, or moving the comma/period inside the rsquo.)

[acabal]

Great, thanks! If we're fixing a transcription error then it's not editorial, but if it's an obvious printer's typo then those are usually fixed in an editorial commit.

Are all of them absolutely errors of some kind?

[vr8hub]

I hesitate to say 100% because I haven't looked at all 100, but I've looked at most of them, and all the ones I've looked at are errors. Whether they're transcription or printer typos will have to be investigated by the person fixing them.

I'll send an email to the editors with a list of the works involved.

[acabal]

OK, sounds good. We can also probably just cut a release soon so they don't have to be on the dev install if they aren't yet.

[vr8hub]

Oh, right, yes, that would be good; that would also start catching more errors in any WIP.