Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for --silent to @xstate/cli #252

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gkiely
Copy link

@gkiely gkiely commented Nov 19, 2022

Adds support for running xstate-cli in silent mode. Still prints errors.

Adds support for running xstate-cli in silent mode. Still prints errors.
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 19, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 2dc8743

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@gkiely gkiely changed the title Add support for --silent Add support for --silent to @xstate/cli Nov 19, 2022
@@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ const writeToFiles = async (uriArray: string[]) => {
filePath: uri,
event,
});
console.log(`${uri} - success`);
if(!silent){
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if(!silent){
if (!silent) {

@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ program
if (path.endsWith(".typegen.ts")) {
return;
}
tasks.push(writeToFiles([path]));
tasks.push(writeToFiles([path], opts.silent));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be more scalable to just pass opts in here? That way we can avoid multiple arguments in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants