Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On this page you reference start and stop in the lookup table but the table has stop twice and no start #7

Open
precisioninfinity opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@precisioninfinity
Copy link
Contributor

https://learngenomics.dev/docs/biological-foundations/translation

"As shown in the amino acid lookup table below, other codons specify that translation should start or stop at a particular position." but in the table it says 'STOP' twice with no 'START'

@claymcleod claymcleod self-assigned this Nov 9, 2022
@claymcleod claymcleod added the fix Either a bug or a typo label Nov 9, 2022
@claymcleod
Copy link
Member

This is a good point! The reason for this is that the START codon is always encoded as methionine in humans. This corresponds to "AUG" in the table. We also say later

the translation machinery correctly reads a start codon ("AUG" or Methionine)

and

where the functional or open reading frame is one that begins with the start codon "AUG" (resulting in the Methionine)

I think the reason for the confusion is that the START codon encodes for an amino acid to be added to the chain, so we have something to put there in the table, whereas the STOP codon does not encode for any amino acid to be added to the chain:

Most codons in messenger RNA correspond to the addition of an amino acid to a growing polypeptide chain, which may ultimately become a protein; stop codons signal the termination of this process by binding release factors, which cause the ribosomal subunits to disassociate, releasing the amino acid chain.

Ultimately, I agree it could be more clear. I probably will add (START) to the table alongside the met that is already there.

@claymcleod claymcleod added enhancement New feature or request and removed fix Either a bug or a typo labels Nov 9, 2022
@precisioninfinity
Copy link
Contributor Author

precisioninfinity commented Nov 9, 2022

Yeah, I like that, I think if you had (START) in the table alongside met as you suggest, then I wouldn't have even questioned it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants