Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DNM-RFC] Pipeline 2.0 discussions #497

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marcinszkudlinski
Copy link
Contributor

@marcinszkudlinski marcinszkudlinski commented May 31, 2024

DO NOT MERGE - DISCUSSION ONLY

After long time I could proceed with Pipeline 2.0 design

To make tracking changes and discussions easier, I translated the initial discussion to .rst format an put it on my private branch

Initial headsup:
thesofproject/sof#7261

discussion and 1st version of the document
https://github.com/orgs/thesofproject/discussions/8645

current version of the document:

https://marcinszkudlinski.github.io/sof-docs/PAGES/architectures/firmware/sof-common/pipeline_2_0/pipeline2_0_discussion.html

the above HTML is a compilation of this PR

please - read it and comment in this PR. I will add all changes as commits to this branch so we'll be able to track changes

@marcinszkudlinski marcinszkudlinski changed the title TEST ONLY [RFC] Pipeline 2.0 discussions Jun 6, 2024
@marcinszkudlinski marcinszkudlinski changed the title [RFC] Pipeline 2.0 discussions [DNM-RFC] Pipeline 2.0 discussions Jun 6, 2024
@marcinszkudlinski marcinszkudlinski marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2024 14:07
@marc-hb marc-hb marked this pull request as draft June 6, 2024 15:10
@gbernatxintel
Copy link

Please include fast mode task in implementation Pipeline 2.0

@marcinszkudlinski
Copy link
Contributor Author

sink/src APIs should have states. Based on a state, module would know if the sink/source has already been configured and if it is allowed to process data from if / put result to it

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

@marcinszkudlinski I think pipeline 2.0 has made some recent progress upstream, do you think we will be able to target this PR in Q4 for merge or do you still have many code PRs pending ?

@marcinszkudlinski
Copy link
Contributor Author

marcinszkudlinski commented Sep 16, 2024

@lgirdwood
The main problem is changing all components/modules API to sink/src

currently the modules don't use any API for interaction with buffers, that makes any modifications extremely hard. The modules are bound hard to comp_buffer and some internal pipeline structures
I don't think we can target P2.0 for Q4, unless we'll find some resources to deal with the modules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants