-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
app: boards: Enable Probe for LNL #8982
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ CONFIG_WINSTREAM_CONSOLE=n | |
|
||
CONFIG_INTEL_ADSP_IPC=y | ||
|
||
CONFIG_PROBE=y | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. commit title: boards There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. OK, thank you fixed There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. btw, the commit still has the typo (updating the pull request title won't change the commit). |
||
CONFIG_PROBE_DMA_MAX=2 | ||
|
||
# Temporary disabled options | ||
CONFIG_TRACE=n | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
config PROBE
bool "Probes enabled"
default y if CAVS
Should this be CAVS | ACE so that all platforms have this by default?
config PROBE_DMA_MAX
int "Maximum injection probe DMAs attached"
The name of the Kconfig is very misleading, consider renaming to make it self-explanatory that this is for INJECTION only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with these handled in separate PRs. Especially with vendor defaults, I wonder if it would be better to have some common definition files e.g. for Intel SOF platforms. The PROBE is really a generic feature not tied to hardware in anyway, so having the defaults set based on HW capabilities is a bit misleading. This is really about which feature Intel SOF builds want to have enabled.