Simplify scales$add_default #5409
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s in the evaled aesthetics
teunbrand
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but small comment you might like to consider.
Does this happen to also fix #4873?
CI on devel is failing (or probably will fail at time of writing) because {vdiffr} has trouble installing, but you might've been aware of that.
|
Yes the one line looks much clearer now. Do you wish to merge this before new merge conflicts arise due to updates to the news file? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #5408 and fix #4873
This PR fixes some corner case issues around the use of
stage(). However, it also just cleans up theadd_default()methods ofScales. Originally this method did a second evaluation of newly added aesthetics for the sake of deducing their type, but that information was already created in the calling function as part of the standard aesthetic evaluation. So, instead, the method is now passed in the evaled aesthetics rather than original data+aesthetics and saves a number of reevaluations