Eighth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1

[grantfirl]

Commit Queue Requirements:

• Fill out all sections of this template.
• All sub component pull requests have been reviewed by their code managers.
• Run the full Intel+GNU RT suite (compared to current baselines) on either Hera/Derecho/Hercules
• Commit 'test_changes.list' from previous step : no changes

---

Description:

This is work from @haiqinli and the changes are identical to #2298

Commit Message:

* UFSWM - minor bugfixes for smoke/dust for RRFS.v1
  * FV3 - minor bugfixes for smoke/dust for RRFS.v1
    * ccpp-physics - minor bugfixes for smoke/dust for RRFS.v1

Priority:

• High: Needed for SRW App

Git Tracking

UFSWM:

• None

Sub component Pull Requests:

• FV3: Eighth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1 NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#898
  • ccpp-physics: Eighth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1 ccpp-physics#237

UFSWM Blocking Dependencies:

• None

---

Changes

Regression Test Changes (Please commit test_changes.list):

• No Baseline Changes.

Input data Changes:

• None.

Library Changes/Upgrades:

• No Updates

---

Testing Log:

• RDHPCS
  • Hera
  • Orion
  • Hercules
  • Jet
  • Gaea
  • Derecho
• WCOSS2
  • Dogwood/Cactus
  • Acorn
• CI
• opnReqTest (complete task if unnecessary)

[grantfirl]

@jkbk2004 @MatthewPyle-NOAA @haiqinli Do you know if the Hercules platform change from #2298 needs to go to the develop branch?

[MatthewMasarik-NOAA]

@jkbk2004 @MatthewMasarik-NOAA @haiqinli Do you know if the Hercules platform change from #2298 needs to go to the develop branch?

Good afternoon, @grantfirl! I don't think I know the answer to that.. just wanted to check if you meant to tag @MatthewPyle-NOAA?

[grantfirl]

@jkbk2004 @MatthewMasarik-NOAA @haiqinli Do you know if the Hercules platform change from #2298 needs to go to the develop branch?

Good afternoon, @grantfirl! I don't think I know the answer to that.. just wanted to check if you meant to tag @MatthewPyle-NOAA?

Yes, indeed. Sorry @MatthewMasarik-NOAA !

[MatthewMasarik-NOAA]

@jkbk2004 @MatthewMasarik-NOAA @haiqinli Do you know if the Hercules platform change from #2298 needs to go to the develop branch?

Good afternoon, @grantfirl! I don't think I know the answer to that.. just wanted to check if you meant to tag @MatthewPyle-NOAA?

Yes, indeed. Sorry @MatthewMasarik-NOAA !

All good @grantfirl!

[jkbk2004]

@grantfirl I think current hercules modulefiles on develop branch are ok. But we can do some pre-test to make sure.

[MatthewPyle-NOAA]

@grantfirl I'm not sure if I'm seeing what you mean in #2298 with regards to a Hercules change.

[grantfirl]

@grantfirl I'm not sure if I'm seeing what you mean in #2298 with regards to a Hercules change.

It looks like there was a change in the rocoto module for use with hercules in tests/rt.sh in that PR.

[jkbk2004]

@grantfirl I'm not sure if I'm seeing what you mean in #2298 with regards to a Hercules change.

It looks like there was a change in the rocoto module for use with hercules in tests/rt.sh in that PR.

Current develop branch is most updated one on hercules:

(base) [jongkim@hercules-login-3 ~]$ module list

Currently Loaded Modules:
  1) contrib/0.1   2) rocoto/1.3.7

[grantfirl]

@grantfirl I'm not sure if I'm seeing what you mean in #2298 with regards to a Hercules change.

It looks like there was a change in the rocoto module for use with hercules in tests/rt.sh in that PR.

Current develop branch is most updated one on hercules:

(base) [jongkim@hercules-login-3 ~]$ module list

Currently Loaded Modules:
  1) contrib/0.1   2) rocoto/1.3.7

Thanks @jkbk2004 . I'll leave this change out of this PR, then.