UTC-176-C35 Six compound tone diacritics

[macchiati]

[176-C35] Consensus: Provisionally assign U+1AD0..U+1AD5 for six compound tone diacritics, as given in L2/23-188. (Reference: Section 7 of L2/23-164)

[181-C60] Consensus: UTC accepts for encoding in Unicode Version 17.0 the following 297 Arabic, Bengali, Han, Kannada, Latin, Oriya, phonetic, Sharada, Tangut, Telugu, and symbol characters for which the code points have previously been provisionally assigned:

    Arabic (40 characters): 088F, FBC3..FBD2, FD90..FD91, FDC8..FDCE, 10EC5..10EC7, 10ED0..10ED8, 10EFA..10EFB
    Bengali (1 character): 09FF
    Han (5 characters): 16FF2..16FF6
    Kannada (1 character): 0CDC
    Latin (2 characters): A7D2, A7D4
    Oriya (2 characters): 0B53..0B54
    Phonetic (30 characters): 1ACF, 1AD0..1ADD, 1AE0..1AEB, A7CE..A7CF, A7F1
    Sharada (8 characters): 11B60..11B67
    Tangut (145 characters): 187F8..187FF, 18D09..18D1E, 18D80..18DF2
    Telugu (1 character): 0C5C
    Symbols (62 characters): 2B96, 1CCFA..1CCFC, 1CEBA..1CED0, 1CEE0..1CEF0, 1F777..1F77A, 1F8D0..1F8D8, 1FA54..1FA57, 1FBFA

• https://github.com/unicode-org/sah/issues/298
• https://github.com/unicode-org/utc-release-management/issues/55

[macchiati]

Thanks, @eggrobin
What do you think about changing https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/blob/main/docs/pipeline.md to be more explicit:

OLD
pipeline-* — Set label
NEW
pipeline-* — Set label to pipeline-provisionally-assigned or pipeline-<version>, depending on whether provisional or not.

[macchiati]

Hmmm. The description does include a link to a UTC decision, namely https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23157.htm#176-C35, but the Pipeline / UTC decision check fails.

[eggrobin]

Hmmm. The description does include a link to a UTC decision, namely https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23157.htm#176-C35, but the Pipeline / UTC decision check fails.

Yeah this regex is too strict, it expects the UTC- prefix: https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/blob/main/py%2Fpipeline-workflow%2Fcheck-utc-decision.py#L10

[macchiati]

Thanks!

[markusicu]

lgtm

[markusicu]

actually, looking at #588, these should also be Diacritic in PropList.txt
@eggrobin FYI

[eggrobin]

Yes, I think this is a fairly clear-cut case of « diacritics are diacritics ».

(For, in contrast, a case where the Diacritic property is not clear-cut, see the very fun discussion in unicode-org/properties#233.)

[eggrobin]

In January markus wrote:

actually, looking at #588, these should also be Diacritic in PropList.txt

(and then Mark sat on it). I’ll go ahead and do it.