Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TEST] Use xref instead of link #473

Conversation

leifmadsen
Copy link
Contributor

Use xref to refer to internal content vs using canonical links to try
passing htmltest before full commit.

Signed-off-by: Leif Madsen lmadsen@redhat.com

Use xref to refer to internal content vs using canonical links to try
passing htmltest before full commit.

Signed-off-by: Leif Madsen <lmadsen@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Hi @leifmadsen. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a validatedpatterns member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mbaldessari
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated message:

You can preview this docs PR at http://473.docs-pr.validatedpatterns.io
Note that they get generated every five minutes, so please wait a bit.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS label Sep 16, 2024
@leifmadsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Guess this is just how htmltest works 🤷🏻

@leifmadsen leifmadsen closed this Sep 16, 2024
@leifmadsen leifmadsen deleted the test/xref-vs-canonical-link branch September 16, 2024 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants