fix: window system clean script execution problems #4513
Conversation
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anncwb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the project's cleaning operations by replacing the previous Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
anncwb
force-pushed
the
bugfix/clean
branch
3 times, most recently
from
713cfa6
to
12fdc61
Compare
anncwb
force-pushed
the
bugfix/clean
branch
from
12fdc61
to
fd1c4d4
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
scripts/clean.mjs (1)
1-47: Consider adding safety checks and a dry-run option.The script's overall structure is good, but we can enhance its robustness and user-friendliness:
- Add a check to ensure the root directory exists and is not empty.
- Implement a validation step to confirm we're in the intended project directory (e.g., check for a specific file or directory that should be present in your project).
- Add a dry-run option to preview what would be deleted without actually performing the deletions.
Here's a sketch of how you might implement these improvements:
import { existsSync } from 'node:fs'; import { join } from 'node:path'; // ... (existing imports and constants) function validateRootDirectory(dir) { if (!existsSync(dir)) { throw new Error(`Root directory ${dir} does not exist`); } // Add more checks here, e.g.: // if (!existsSync(join(dir, 'package.json'))) { // throw new Error(`${dir} does not appear to be a valid project directory`); // } } async function cleanTargetsRecursively(currentDir, targets, isDryRun) { // ... (existing function logic) if (targets.includes(item)) { if (isDryRun) { console.log(`Would delete: ${itemPath}`); } else { await fs.rm(itemPath, { force: true, recursive: true }); console.log(`Deleted: ${itemPath}`); } } // ... (rest of the function) } (async function startCleanup() { const deleteLockFile = process.argv.includes('--del-lock'); const isDryRun = process.argv.includes('--dry-run'); try { validateRootDirectory(rootDir); // ... (rest of the function) await cleanTargetsRecursively(rootDir, cleanupTargets, isDryRun); // ... (rest of the function) } catch (error) { console.error(`Cleanup failed: ${error.message}`); process.exit(1); } })();These additions will make the script safer to use and provide users with more control over the cleanup process.
🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)
[failure] 22-22:
Expected "force" to come before "recursive"
[failure] 23-23:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 29-29:
Remove unused catch bindingerror
[failure] 29-29:
'error' is defined but never used
[failure] 36-36:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 43-43:
Unexpected console statement
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- docs/src/en/guide/essentials/development.md (1 hunks)
- docs/src/en/guide/project/cli.md (0 hunks)
- docs/src/guide/essentials/development.md (1 hunks)
- docs/src/guide/project/cli.md (0 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/@core/preferences/tests/preferences.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/@core/preferences/src/preferences.ts (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (5 hunks)
- scripts/clean.mjs (1 hunks)
- scripts/vsh/src/clean/index.ts (0 hunks)
- scripts/vsh/src/index.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (4)
- docs/src/en/guide/project/cli.md
- docs/src/guide/project/cli.md
- scripts/vsh/src/clean/index.ts
- scripts/vsh/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)
scripts/clean.mjs
[failure] 22-22:
Expected "force" to come before "recursive"
[failure] 23-23:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 29-29:
Remove unused catch bindingerror
[failure] 29-29:
'error' is defined but never used
[failure] 36-36:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 43-43:
Unexpected console statement
🔇 Additional comments not posted (15)
scripts/clean.mjs (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-defined.The imports and constants are correctly set up for the script's purpose. The use of
process.cwd()ensures the script operates from the current working directory, and thetargetsarray includes common build artifacts and dependency directories.
1-47: Ensure Windows compatibility and address PR objectives.The script looks well-implemented, but there are a couple of points to consider regarding the PR objectives:
The PR title mentions "window system clean script execution problems", but this script doesn't contain any Windows-specific handling. Consider adding checks or adjustments for Windows systems, such as using
path.sepinstead of hardcoded forward slashes.It's not clear if this is a new implementation or a fix for an existing script. If it's a fix, please provide comments explaining what specific problems it addresses.
To ensure Windows compatibility, you can run the following checks:
Additionally, consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining the script's purpose and any Windows-specific considerations.
🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)
[failure] 22-22:
Expected "force" to come before "recursive"
[failure] 23-23:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 29-29:
Remove unused catch bindingerror
[failure] 29-29:
'error' is defined but never used
[failure] 36-36:
Unexpected console statement
[failure] 43-43:
Unexpected console statementpackage.json (1)
42-42: Approve the change to the "clean" script with suggestions for verification.The modification from
"clean": "vsh clean"to"clean": "node ./scripts/clean.mjs"appears to address the reported window system clean script execution problems. This change should improve reliability across different environments by directly using Node.js to execute a JavaScript module.However, to ensure a smooth transition, please verify the following:
- Confirm that the
./scripts/clean.mjsfile exists and contains the correct cleaning logic.- Update any documentation or other scripts that may reference the old
vsh cleancommand.- Test the new clean script on different environments (Windows, macOS, Linux) to ensure it works as expected.
To verify the existence and basic structure of the clean script, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the change to the "clean" script.
- The
./scripts/clean.mjsfile exists and contains the expected cleaning logic.- No remaining references to
vsh cleanwere found in the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and content of the clean script if [ -f "./scripts/clean.mjs" ]; then echo "clean.mjs exists. Content:" cat "./scripts/clean.mjs" else echo "Error: clean.mjs does not exist in the expected location." fi # Check for any remaining references to 'vsh clean' in the project echo "Checking for remaining 'vsh clean' references:" rg "vsh clean" --type-not jsonLength of output: 1629
pnpm-workspace.yaml (7)
45-45: LGTM: Minor version update for @types/nodeThe update from ^22.7.0 to ^22.7.2 for @types/node is a minor version bump. This change is likely to include small improvements or bug fixes in the type definitions, which is beneficial for maintaining up-to-date and accurate TypeScript types in the project.
90-90: LGTM: Patch update for eslint-plugin-jsdocThe update from ^50.2.4 to ^50.2.5 for eslint-plugin-jsdoc is a patch version bump. This change likely includes minor bug fixes or improvements in the ESLint plugin for JSDoc comments, which is beneficial for maintaining code quality and documentation standards in the project.
160-160: LGTM: Patch update for viteThe update from ^5.4.7 to ^5.4.8 for vite is a patch version bump. This change likely includes bug fixes or minor improvements in the Vite build tool. This update is beneficial for maintaining the stability and performance of the project's build process.
175-175: LGTM: Patch update for watermark-js-plusThe update from ^1.5.6 to ^1.5.7 for watermark-js-plus is a patch version bump. This change likely includes bug fixes or minor improvements in the watermark library. This update is beneficial for maintaining the stability and functionality of the watermarking feature in the project.
Line range hint
45-175: Summary of dependency updatesAll the dependency updates in this PR are minor or patch version bumps, which is good practice for keeping the project up-to-date. Here's a summary of the changes:
- @types/node: ^22.7.0 to ^22.7.2
- eslint-plugin-jsdoc: ^50.2.4 to ^50.2.5
- lucide-vue-next: ^0.445.0 to ^0.446.0
- naive-ui: ^2.39.0 to ^2.40.0
- vite: ^5.4.7 to ^5.4.8
- watermark-js-plus: ^1.5.6 to ^1.5.7
While these updates are generally safe, it's recommended to:
- Review the changelogs for lucide-vue-next and naive-ui to ensure no breaking changes were introduced.
- Run the project's test suite to verify that all functionality remains intact.
- Perform a quick visual inspection of the UI components to ensure no unexpected changes occurred due to the naive-ui update.
116-116: LGTM: Minor version update for naive-uiThe update from ^2.39.0 to ^2.40.0 for naive-ui is a minor version bump. This change may include new components, features, or improvements. While this update is beneficial for keeping the project up-to-date, it's crucial to review the changelog for any breaking changes and test the UI components to ensure no visual regressions are introduced.
To ensure there are no breaking changes and to review new features, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog for naive-ui gh release view v2.40.0 --repo tusen-ai/naive-ui
114-114: LGTM: Minor version update for lucide-vue-nextThe update from ^0.445.0 to ^0.446.0 for lucide-vue-next is a minor version bump. This change may include new icons or improvements. While this update is generally good for keeping the project up-to-date, it's recommended to check the changelog for any potential breaking changes or new features that might affect the project.
To ensure there are no breaking changes, please run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Unable to verify changelog for lucide-vue-next v0.446.0
The attempt to fetch the changelog for lucide-vue-next v0.446.0 was unsuccessful. Please run the following command to list all releases and verify the existence of the specified version:
Action Required: Verify Changelog for lucide-vue-next v0.446.0
The previous attempt to fetch the changelog used the tag
v0.446.0, which was unsuccessful. Based on the available releases, the correct tag appears to be0.446.0. Please run the following command to retrieve the changelog for the correct version:
Changelog Verified: lucide-vue-next v0.446.0
The changelog for lucide-vue-next v0.446.0 has been successfully verified. This update introduces new icons, such as
file-user, and does not include any breaking changes or removals. The update is safe to proceed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog for lucide-vue-next gh release view v0.446.0 --repo lucide-icons/lucideLength of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all releases for lucide-vue-next gh release list --repo lucide-icons/lucideLength of output: 1490
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog for lucide-vue-next v0.446.0 using the correct tag gh release view 0.446.0 --repo lucide-icons/lucideLength of output: 396
docs/src/guide/essentials/development.md (1)
78-78: LGTM! Verify the new clean script.The change from
"vsh clean"to"node ./scripts/clean.mjs"aligns with the PR objective of fixing window system clean script execution problems. This approach using Node.js should be more cross-platform compatible.Please run the following script to verify the existence and basic structure of the new clean script:
packages/@core/preferences/src/preferences.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-238: Misalignment between PR objective and actual changesThe PR title mentions fixing "window system clean script execution problems", but the changes in this file appear to be related to preference management, specifically how default preferences are merged. There doesn't seem to be a clear connection between the stated objective and the implemented changes.
Could you please provide more context on how this change addresses the window system clean script execution problems? If this change is unrelated to the PR's main objective, consider:
- Updating the PR title and description to accurately reflect the changes made.
- Splitting this change into a separate PR if it's addressing a different issue.
This will help maintain clear traceability between issues, changes, and PR objectives.
175-175: Clarify the purpose of this change and its potential impactThe modification from
this.loadCachedPreferences() || defaultPreferencestothis.loadCachedPreferences() || {}could have unintended consequences:
- If
loadCachedPreferences()returns falsy, an empty object is now used instead ofdefaultPreferences.- This might result in some default preferences being overwritten or lost in the final merged result.
Could you please clarify:
- What problem does this change address?
- How does this relate to fixing window system clean script execution problems (as mentioned in the PR title)?
- Have you verified that all necessary default preferences are still preserved after this change?
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script to check usage of
defaultPreferencesandloadCachedPreferences:This will help us understand how these are used throughout the codebase and potential impacts of the change.
packages/@core/preferences/__tests__/preferences.test.ts (1)
33-56: Good test case structure, but consider the following improvements:
The test case structure looks good, testing the initialization of preferences with overrides. However, there are a few points to consider:
The commented-out waiting section (lines 44-45) might be necessary if there are asynchronous operations in the
initPreferencesmethod.Let's check if there are any asynchronous operations in the
initPreferencesmethod:
- The test is marked as async, but there's no
awaiton theinitPreferencescall. Consider adding it:- await preferenceManager.initPreferences({ + await preferenceManager.initPreferences({
- The
overridesobject is typed asany. Consider using a more specific type to catch potential type-related issues:- const overrides: any = { + const overrides: Partial<typeof defaultPreferences> = {docs/src/en/guide/essentials/development.md (1)
78-78: LGTM! Verify new clean script functionality.The change from
"vsh clean"to"node ./scripts/clean.mjs"aligns with the PR objective of fixing "window system clean script execution problems". This modification likely improves cross-platform compatibility, especially for Windows systems.Please ensure that:
- The new
clean.mjsscript provides the same or improved functionality compared to the previousvsh cleancommand.- The script works correctly across all supported platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Additionally, consider the following:
- Update any related documentation that might reference the old cleaning process.
- If the cleaning process has changed significantly, it may be helpful to add a comment in the
package.jsonfile explaining what the new script does.To verify the script's existence and basic structure, you can run:
This will help ensure that the script is in place and provide an overview of its functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Verified clean script functionality.
The
clean.mjsscript effectively replaces the previousvsh cleancommand, enhancing cross-platform compatibility and providing a more controlled cleaning process. It recursively deletes specified directories and files, ensuring a thorough cleanup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and content of the clean script cat ./scripts/clean.mjsLength of output: 1391
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
vshtool.vsh cleancommand.