Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Store Decimal precision and size while normalising #15785

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

GuptaManan100
Copy link
Member

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 commented Apr 23, 2024

Description

This PR fixes part of the issue described in #15784.

As described in #15784 (comment), the problem arises because when Vtgates normalize the decimal values, they don't store the scale and length. This PR makes this change by adding 2 more fields to the Arguments struct.

This also affects the caching of queries. Since the precision of 100.01 and 100.0001 are different, queries that only differ in this literal will actually have different results and shouldn't be cached to the same plan.

In order to find the size and precision of the decimal value, we are relying on the existing code in decimal package to parse the decimal value and return the exponent and the size.

https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.3/en/precision-math-decimal-characteristics.html page talks about decimal value and its handling of length and precision

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 23, 2024
@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Apr 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Apr 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 12:01
go/vt/sqlparser/normalizer_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/vt/vtgate/semantics/typer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/vt/sqlparser/normalizer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@vmg vmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think adding the size/scale to the bind var replacement is a good idea. Let's simplify the calculation of the values though.

go/vt/sqlparser/ast_funcs.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/decimal/decimal.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 requested a review from vmg April 24, 2024 08:31
go/mysql/decimal/scan.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dbussink and others added 2 commits April 24, 2024 22:08
Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 requested a review from vmg April 25, 2024 06:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@vmg vmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking bueno. Thanks manan!

Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
@GuptaManan100
Copy link
Member Author

Awesome!!! Thank you everyone for the reviews! The last commit adds the complete Q14 to the test suite verifying that the query works now!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.43%. Comparing base (96b1419) to head (0588f63).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/sqlparser/normalizer.go 60.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15785      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.44%   68.43%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1558     1558              
  Lines      195822   195928     +106     
==========================================
+ Hits       134032   134087      +55     
- Misses      61790    61841      +51     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vmg vmg merged commit 8c146a9 into vitessio:main Apr 25, 2024
104 checks passed
@vmg vmg deleted the tpch-decimal-problem branch April 25, 2024 08:50
systay pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Manan Gupta <35839558+GuptaManan100@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: TPCH query returns incorrect precision count in the fields
4 participants