Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linkname removal (step 1) #16016

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

Linkname removal (step 1) #16016

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

vmg
Copy link
Collaborator

@vmg vmg commented May 27, 2024

Description

First step towards fixing #16015.

In this PR I've cleaned up to Atof routines, the internal strhash and the memory size calculator. The only remaining linkname usage in the hack package is to disable serialization randomness in ProtoBuf.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

vmg added 2 commits May 27, 2024 13:08
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <vmg@strn.cat>
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <vmg@strn.cat>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 27, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 27, 2024
@vmg vmg added Type: Internal Cleanup Component: Build/CI and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels May 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone May 27, 2024
@vmg vmg changed the title Vmg/linkname Linkname removal (step 1) May 27, 2024
vmg added 2 commits May 27, 2024 18:07
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <vmg@strn.cat>
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <vmg@strn.cat>
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.70984% with 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.29%. Comparing base (d95ce48) to head (5098caa).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/mysql/fastparse/atof.go 94.16% 8 Missing ⚠️
go/hack/msize.go 66.66% 5 Missing ⚠️
go/mysql/fastparse/eisel_lemire.go 91.66% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16016      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.27%   68.29%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1562     1564       +2     
  Lines      197319   197499     +180     
==========================================
+ Hits       134714   134876     +162     
- Misses      62605    62623      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@dbussink dbussink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bunch of copy paste from Go, but that seems like the right answer here!

Comment on lines +31 to +35
// Copied from the Go runtime, msize_noallocheaders.go

package hack

const (
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does that mean that every time the go runtime changes for this file (and also the package strconv) we will need to re-copy the file?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For msize yes, that's the price of keeping our memory usage statistics accurate. FWIW, this file hasn't been changed in more than 5 years: the sizes of the GC allocations are pretty much settled at this point.

For strconv, no. We have adapted the function to parse exactly the syntax that MySQL expects, so we do not need to ever upgrade it in the future.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay got it. I was worried these were changing often every x release, but if it has not for over 5 years that's nice

@dbussink dbussink merged commit b49494e into vitessio:main Jun 10, 2024
93 checks passed
@dbussink dbussink deleted the vmg/linkname branch June 10, 2024 09:08
systay pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
* cherry pick of 16016

* Remove string hash hack

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
@dbussink dbussink mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2024
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants