Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java from 3.24.3 to 3.25.5 in /java #16809

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 19, 2024

Bumps com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java from 3.24.3 to 3.25.5.

Commits
  • 9d0ec0f Updating version.json and repo version numbers to: 25.5
  • 4a197e7 Merge pull request #18387 from protocolbuffers/cp-lp-25
  • b5a7cf7 Remove RecursiveGroup test case which doesn't exist in 25.x pre-Editions
  • f000b7e Fix merge conflict by adding optional label to proto2 unittest_lite.proto
  • 4728531 Add recursion check when parsing unknown fields in Java.
  • 850fcce Internal change
  • b704498 Internal change
  • e673479 Fix cord handling in DynamicMessage and oneofs. (#18375)
  • 8a60b65 Merge pull request #17704 from protocolbuffers/cp-segv
  • 94a2663 Fixed a SEGV when deep copying a non-reified sub-message.
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf) from 3.24.3 to 3.25.5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/protobuf_release.bzl)
- [Commits](protocolbuffers/protobuf@v3.24.3...v3.25.5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code labels Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants