Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differentiate visual indicators (smileys) in Monitor #353

Open
StC-OSM opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Differentiate visual indicators (smileys) in Monitor #353

StC-OSM opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
1-monitor monitor functionality related issue enhancement

Comments

@StC-OSM
Copy link

StC-OSM commented Nov 17, 2023

Currently, smileys go away when deviations are introduced between the reference and the current state of OSM, or when the route is not continuous. These are two different situations that do not occur at the same rate and do not require the same actions. It would be useful to differentiate them, e.g. with two smiley faces.

Actually, it may be useful to have one smiley face for continuity and one for each reference, allowing to have several references per line. This could be a user-defined configuration for each monitor.

@vmarc vmarc self-assigned this Nov 17, 2023
@vmarc vmarc added enhancement 1-monitor monitor functionality related issue labels Nov 17, 2023
@vmarc
Copy link
Owner

vmarc commented Nov 17, 2023

I understand and like the idea of having two separate smileys.

For the second suggestion:

Actually, it may be useful to have one smiley face for continuity and one for each reference, allowing to have several references per line.

@StC-OSM could you perhaps make an example of how the "multiple references per line" would look like (for example: maybe make a new image by copying parts of a screenshot of an existing page, and compose this into what the new page would look like)?

@StC-OSM
Copy link
Author

StC-OSM commented Nov 17, 2023

This is an image that I hacked together, but I'm not a designer.
Capture d’écran 2023-11-17 à 22 38 29

@StC-OSM
Copy link
Author

StC-OSM commented Nov 30, 2023

Let me add a usage scenario, that is related to another issue I filed about user accounts.

My contribution to the QA of hiking and cycling routes is mostly about continuity. When in OSM mode the deviations and their impact on the smiley just distract me from my role. If I could I would select the (currently inexistant) NoRef mode, whereas others would make a different choice

@vmarc
Copy link
Owner

vmarc commented Nov 30, 2023

If I could I would select the (currently inexistant) NoRef mode,

good idea!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1-monitor monitor functionality related issue enhancement
Projects
Status: Todo - monitor 1
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants