enhance: header for form builder UI redesign #1488
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the form builder and its associated components. Key modifications include the integration of Tailwind CSS for styling, updates to various form field templates, and improvements in JavaScript handling for user interactions. The changes also involve structural updates to the form builder interface, localization enhancements, and adjustments to the underlying PHP classes for better functionality and code organization. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
tailwind.config.js (1)
4-4: LGTM! Consider using consistent path format.The addition of
'./admin/form-builder/views/*.php'to thecontentarray is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of redesigning the form builder UI and integrating Tailwind CSS. This change will ensure that Tailwind CSS scans the PHP files in the form builder views directory for class names.For consistency, consider using the same path format for all entries. You could update the line as follows:
- content: ['./assets/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,vue,html}', './includes/Admin/views/*.php', './admin/form-builder/views/*.php'], + content: ['./assets/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,vue,html}', './includes/Admin/views/**/*.php', './admin/form-builder/views/**/*.php'],This change uses
**/*.phpinstead of*.php, which will recursively search all subdirectories for PHP files, ensuring consistency with the assets path and potentially catching any PHP files in nested directories.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_title/template.php (2)
8-9: Consider preserving dynamic class binding alongside Tailwind CSS classes.The integration of Tailwind CSS classes is a positive change that aligns with the PR objectives and modernizes the input styling. However, the removal of the dynamic
:classbinding might reduce flexibility in applying conditional styles.Consider combining both approaches:
:class="[ class_names('textfield'), 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6' ]"This approach maintains the ability to apply dynamic classes while also including the new Tailwind CSS classes.
11-11: Approved: Semantic HTML improvement with a minor suggestion.The replacement of the
spanwith apelement for help text is a positive change, improving semantic correctness. The addition of Tailwind CSS classes enhances styling consistency and readability.To further improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-describedbyattribute to the input element and a correspondingidto the help text paragraph. This will explicitly associate the help text with the input for screen readers.Example:
<input ... :aria-describedby="field.help ? 'help-text-' + field.name : undefined" > <p v-if="field.help" :id="'help-text-' + field.name" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help" ></p>admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-text_field/template.php (1)
8-9: Approve class changes with a suggestion for improvementThe integration of Tailwind CSS classes and the updated class binding syntax are good improvements. They align with the PR objective and follow Vue.js best practices.
Consider combining all classes into the dynamic binding to avoid potential conflicts:
- :class="class_names('textfield')" - class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6" + :class="[ + class_names('textfield'), + 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6' + ]"This approach ensures all classes are managed in one place and prevents potential overrides.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php (1)
5-5: Tailwind CSS integration looks good, consider reviewing the max-width override.The integration of Tailwind CSS classes aligns well with the PR objectives and provides comprehensive styling for the dropdown. Good job on implementing these changes.
However, the use of
!wpuf-max-w-fullsuggests an override. Consider reviewing if this override is necessary or if it's addressing a styling conflict that could be resolved in a more maintainable way.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (1)
8-9: Excellent use of Tailwind CSS and dynamic class binding.The addition of Tailwind CSS classes and the dynamic class binding improves the styling and flexibility of the textarea element. This aligns well with the PR objective of integrating Tailwind CSS into the form builder.
Consider extracting the long list of Tailwind CSS classes into a separate constant or computed property for better maintainability. For example:
computed: { textareaClasses() { return 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6'; } }Then use it in the template:
:class="[class_names('textareafield'), textareaClasses]"This approach would make the template cleaner and easier to maintain.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php (3)
2-4: Approve wrapper div with a suggestion for improvementThe addition of the wrapper div with conditional rendering based on the
field.inlineproperty is a good improvement for layout flexibility. The use of Tailwind CSS for spacing is also appropriate.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this wrapper div for better code readability. For example:
<!-- Wrapper for vertical layout when not inline --> <div v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" class="wpuf-space-y-6">
5-7: Approve radio button wrapper with accessibility suggestionThe use of flexbox for aligning radio buttons and labels is a good improvement. The conditional rendering and iteration over options are implemented correctly.
To enhance accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the wrapper div. This can help screen readers understand the purpose of the group. For example:<div v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" - class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> + class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center" + :aria-label="field.label + ' option'">
20-20: Approve help text changes with accessibility suggestionThe change from
<span>to<p>for the help text is a good improvement in terms of semantic HTML. The added Tailwind CSS classes enhance the styling and spacing.To further improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-describedbyattribute to the radio input elements that references the help text. This will ensure screen readers associate the help text with the radio buttons. Here's how you can implement this:
- Add an
idto the help text paragraph:- <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> + <p v-if="field.help" :id="field.name + '_help'" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p>
- Update the radio input to reference this id:
<input type="radio" + :aria-describedby="field.help ? field.name + '_help' : null" class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600">This change will improve the accessibility of the form by explicitly associating the help text with the radio buttons.
src/css/admin/form-builder.css (2)
5-15: Consider increasing the z-index for the modal.The modal styles look good overall, providing a nice fixed positioning and visual depth with the box-shadow. However, the z-index of 99 might be too low for a modal, potentially causing issues with other elements overlapping it.
Consider increasing the z-index to a higher value, such as 9999, to ensure the modal appears above other elements:
.wpuf-form-template-modal { /* ... other styles ... */ - z-index: 99; + z-index: 9999; }
35-42: Consider adding focus styles for better accessibility.The transition styles for the dropdown items look good and make effective use of the custom utility classes. However, to improve accessibility, consider adding styles for focus states as well.
Add focus styles to ensure keyboard users can also trigger the dropdown:
.wpuf-dropdown-container:hover .wpuf-dropdown-item { @apply wpuf-opacity-100 wpuf-scale-100; } + +.wpuf-dropdown-container:focus-within .wpuf-dropdown-item { + @apply wpuf-opacity-100 wpuf-scale-100; +}This change ensures that the dropdown items are visible when the container is focused using keyboard navigation.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-checkbox_field/template.php (2)
2-19: Vertical layout implementation looks good with a minor suggestion.The new vertical layout for checkboxes is well-structured and uses Tailwind CSS effectively. The conditional rendering and flex container provide a clean, modern look with proper spacing.
Consider adding an
aria-labelto the checkbox input for improved accessibility. For example:<input type="checkbox" :value="val" :checked="is_selected(val)" :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" + :aria-label="label" class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600">
22-41: Inline layout implementation is consistent and well-structured.The inline layout for checkboxes is implemented effectively, maintaining consistency with the vertical layout structure while applying appropriate Tailwind CSS classes for horizontal alignment.
For consistency with the vertical layout suggestion, consider adding an
aria-labelto the checkbox input in this section as well:<input type="checkbox" :value="val" :checked="is_selected(val)" :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" + :aria-label="label" class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600">admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php (1)
Line range hint
1-48: Overall assessment of form taxonomy template changesThe changes to this template file significantly enhance the UI and accessibility of form elements:
- Consistent use of Tailwind CSS classes improves styling and maintainability.
- Semantic HTML improvements (e.g., using
<p>for help text) enhance accessibility and SEO.- The addition of placeholders and dynamic class names increases flexibility and user guidance.
However, the introduction of
disabledattributes on select and input elements raises concerns about usability. Ensure this is intentional and aligns with the form's purpose.Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the reasoning behind disabling form elements, especially if it's part of a larger UX strategy.
- Implement client-side validation or tooltips to explain why certain elements are disabled, improving user understanding.
- Review the form's overall accessibility, ensuring that all users can effectively interact with both enabled and disabled elements.
includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Form_Template.php (2)
85-89: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The version check and conditional enqueuing of stylesheets is a good approach for maintaining backward compatibility while allowing for updates in newer versions. This change ensures that the appropriate stylesheet is loaded based on the plugin version.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the reason for this version check, which could help future maintainers understand the rationale behind this change. For example:
// Use different stylesheets for compatibility with older versions and new features in 4.0.12+ if ( defined( 'WPUF_PRO_VERSION' ) && version_compare( WPUF_PRO_VERSION, '4.0.12', '<' ) ) { wp_enqueue_style( 'wpuf-form-builder' ); } else { wp_enqueue_style( 'wpuf-admin-form-builder' ); }
Country Dropdown Implementation Missing
The verification did not find any implementations related to the country dropdown feature as specified in the linked issue #638. This indicates that the current changes do not address the requirement to allow users to select only specific countries in the dropdown.
- Linked Issue Not Addressed: No country dropdown functionality found in the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-89: Verify alignment with PR objectives and linked issueWhile the changes in this file contribute to the overall enhancement of the form builder UI by updating stylesheet handling, they don't directly address the specific objectives mentioned in the PR description, such as redesigning the header section of the post form or the country dropdown issue (linked issue #638).
Could you please clarify how these changes relate to the stated PR objectives? If they are part of a larger set of changes, it would be helpful to understand the context. Additionally, please ensure that the country dropdown issue is addressed in other parts of this PR or in a separate PR.
To verify the implementation of the country dropdown feature, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any changes related to the country dropdown feature in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for country dropdown implementation in PHP files # Search for country-related functions or variables echo "Searching for country-related implementations:" rg --type php -i '(country|nation).*dropdown' -g '!vendor/' # Search for modifications to billing address section echo "Searching for billing address modifications:" rg --type php -i 'billing.*address' -g '!vendor/'Length of output: 6491
includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form.php (2)
264-266: LGTM! Consider adding hover effect for consistency.The changes look good and align with the PR objective of integrating Tailwind CSS. The new classes improve the visual presentation and responsiveness of the notification tab.
For consistency with other tabs (if they have hover effects), consider adding a hover effect to the text color:
- <a href="#wpuf-form-builder-notification" class="wpuf-whitespace-nowrap wpuf-border-b-2 wpuf-border-transparent wpuf-px-1 wpuf-py-4 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-500 hover:wpuf-border-gray-300 hover:wpuf-text-gray-700"> + <a href="#wpuf-form-builder-notification" class="wpuf-whitespace-nowrap wpuf-border-b-2 wpuf-border-transparent wpuf-px-1 wpuf-py-4 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-500 hover:wpuf-border-gray-300 hover:wpuf-text-gray-700 hover:wpuf-text-gray-900">This change will make the text slightly darker on hover, improving user feedback.
Line range hint
1-524: Consider reviewing other UI elements for Tailwind CSS integration.While the changes to the notification tab look good, it might be worth reviewing other UI elements in this file for potential Tailwind CSS integration. This could include other tabs, buttons, or form elements to ensure a consistent design language throughout the form builder.
To maintain consistency, you may want to:
- Review other methods that generate HTML, such as
add_settings_tabs,add_settings_tab_contents, etc.- Gradually replace traditional CSS classes with Tailwind utility classes where appropriate.
- Ensure that the Tailwind CSS classes are properly loaded and compiled for all affected components.
This incremental approach will help in achieving a cohesive UI design across the entire form builder.
includes/Assets.php (1)
109-179: LGTM! Minor suggestion for consistency.The changes improve code readability and add a new style for the admin form builder. The formatting is now more consistent, which is great.
For complete consistency, consider adding an extra space after the
=>operator for all entries. For example:- 'frontend-forms' => [ - 'src' => WPUF_ASSET_URI . '/css/frontend-forms.css', + 'frontend-forms' => [ + 'src' => WPUF_ASSET_URI . '/css/frontend-forms.css', ],This would make the alignment of all elements consistent throughout the array.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (2)
495-505: LGTM: Enhanced user feedback for shortcode copyingThe changes to the clipboard event handler improve user feedback and state management. The tooltip now shows "Shortcode copied!" and the
shortcodeCopiedstate is properly managed.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using a constant for the tooltip text and timeout duration to make future updates easier. For example:
const COPIED_TOOLTIP_TEXT = 'Shortcode copied!'; const TOOLTIP_RESET_DELAY = 1000; // milliseconds // ... in the clipboard.on('success') handler $(e.trigger) .attr('data-original-title', COPIED_TOOLTIP_TEXT) .tooltip('show'); self.shortcodeCopied = true; setTimeout(function() { $(e.trigger).tooltip('hide') .attr('data-original-title', self.i18n.copy_shortcode); self.shortcodeCopied = false; }, TOOLTIP_RESET_DELAY);This change would make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future.
906-910: Consider removing commented out codeThe
resizeBuilderContainerfunction and its related event listener have been commented out. It's generally a good practice to remove unused code rather than commenting it out, as it can lead to confusion and clutter in the codebase.If this functionality might be needed in the future, consider removing it entirely and relying on version control history to retrieve it if necessary. This will keep the codebase cleaner and more maintainable.
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (1)
495-504: LGTM: Improved feedback for shortcode copying.The changes to the clipboard event handler enhance user feedback by providing a more specific message when copying the shortcode. The
shortcodeCopiedstate is also properly managed.Consider extracting the timeout duration (1000ms) into a named constant for better readability and maintainability. For example:
const TOOLTIP_RESET_DELAY = 1000; // ... in the setTimeout call setTimeout(function() { // ... existing code }, TOOLTIP_RESET_DELAY);languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (1)
Incomplete Translations Detected
Multiple translation strings in
languages/wp-user-frontend.potare still empty or missing. It's essential to complete all translations to ensure full localization support for the WP User Frontend plugin.
- Empty
msgstrEntries: 3556 lines havemsgstr "".- Missing Translations: 57
msgidentries lack correspondingmsgstr.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-3556: LGTM! Localization template updated.The POT file has been successfully updated with a new creation date and revised message strings. This update is crucial for maintaining up-to-date translations for the WP User Frontend plugin.
To ensure all strings are properly localized, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any untranslated or empty strings in the POT file # Search for empty msgstr entries echo "Checking for empty translations:" grep -n 'msgstr ""' languages/wp-user-frontend.pot # Search for any msgid without a corresponding msgstr echo "Checking for missing translations:" awk '/msgid/{id=$0; getline; if ($0 !~ /msgstr/) print NR-1, id}' languages/wp-user-frontend.potLength of output: 27677
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-old.php (2)
37-37: Avoid inline styles; use CSS classes insteadAt line 37, the inline style
style="margin-top: 13px;"is applied directly to the button element. Consider moving this style into a CSS class to improve maintainability and keep the HTML clean.
40-40: Use semantic HTML elements for icons to enhance accessibilityUsing
<i>elements for icons, as seen at line 40, is outdated and may affect accessibility. Consider using<span>elements with appropriate ARIA attributes or roles to improve semantic meaning and assistive technology support.admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (2)
88-90: Addaria-hiddento Decorative SVG IconsThe SVG icons used for visual purposes should include
aria-hidden="true"to prevent them from being announced by screen readers, enhancing accessibility.Apply this change to the SVG elements:
<svg + aria-hidden="true" v-if="!shortcodeCopied" class="group-hover:wpuf-rotate-6 group-hover:wpuf-stroke-gray-500 wpuf-stroke-gray-400" width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">Repeat for the second SVG icon.
Also applies to: 95-97
109-109: Simplify Dynamic Class BindingUsing a ternary operator within the
:classbinding can reduce readability.Consider simplifying the class assignment:
:class="is_form_saving ? 'wpuf-cursor-wait' : 'wpuf-cursor-pointer'"Alternatively, use computed properties for cleaner templates.
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (2)
866-867: Consolidateclassbindings in the<textarea>elementThe
<textarea>element has both:classandclassattributes. While this is valid, consolidating them can improve readability and maintainability.Consider merging the static and dynamic classes:
<textarea v-if="'no' === field.rich" :placeholder="field.placeholder" :default="field.default" :rows="field.rows" :cols="field.cols" - :class="class_names('textareafield')" - class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6">{{ field.default }}</textarea> + :class="[class_names('textareafield'), 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6']">{{ field.default }}</textarea>
424-441: Review the use of multipleclassbindings on the<input>elementThe
<input>element has both:classandclassattributes. While both can be used together, ensure that there is no duplication or conflict between dynamically bound classes and static classes.If possible, consolidate the classes for clarity:
<input type="checkbox" :value="val" :checked="is_selected(val)" - :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" - class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"> + :class="[class_names('checkbox_btns'), 'wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600']">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsontemp.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
- Gruntfile.js (5 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-checkbox_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_title/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php (2 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-text_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (3 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-old.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (1 hunks)
- assets/css/admin/form-builder.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js-templates/form-components.php (5 hunks)
- assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (3 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form.php (1 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (2 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Form_Template.php (1 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Posting.php (1 hunks)
- includes/Admin/template-parts/modal.php (0 hunks)
- includes/Admin/views/post-form.php (1 hunks)
- includes/Assets.php (1 hunks)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (5 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/css/admin/form-builder.css (1 hunks)
- tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- includes/Admin/template-parts/modal.php
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (36)
includes/Admin/views/post-form.php (2)
2-10: LGTM: Version check logic is well-implemented.The version check logic is correctly implemented:
- It properly checks if
WPUF_PRO_VERSIONis defined before using it.- It uses
version_compare()for accurate version string comparison.- It provides backwards compatibility for versions below 4.0.12.
This approach ensures a smooth transition between versions and prevents potential errors.
1-11: Clarify the relationship between these changes and the PR objectives.The PR objectives mention redesigning the header section of a post form and addressing issues with the country dropdown. However, the changes in this file appear to be more structural and version-related. Could you please clarify:
- How do these changes in the form builder view relate to the header redesign?
- Is this a preparatory change for the larger UI enhancements mentioned in the PR description?
- How does this change contribute to addressing the country dropdown issue (Please allow us to use only a few countries of our choice #638)?
Additional context would help in understanding the full scope and impact of these changes in relation to the stated objectives.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_title/template.php (1)
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the necessity of disabling the input field.
The addition of the
disabledattribute to the input element prevents user interaction. This seems inconsistent with the purpose of a form input, especially one that appears to be for a post title.Could you please clarify the reasoning behind disabling this field? If this wasn't intentional, consider removing the
disabledattribute to allow user input.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php (2)
14-14: Improved semantic structure and styling for help text.The change from
<span>to<p>for the help text improves the semantic structure of the HTML. The added Tailwind CSS classes provide appropriate styling. These changes align with best practices for displaying help text and enhance the overall quality of the code.
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueClarify the purpose of disabling the dropdown.
The
disabledattribute has been added to the<select>element, which prevents user interaction. This seems to contradict the typical purpose of a dropdown field and the objectives of the PR. Could you please clarify if this is intentional and, if so, explain the reasoning behind it?To verify if this change is consistent across other form fields, we can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Disabled attribute usage is consistent across form components.
The addition of the
disabledattribute inform-dropdown_field/template.phpaligns with its usage in other form components within theadmin/form-builderdirectory. This suggests that the change is intentional and part of a consistent pattern to control form element states.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for 'disabled' attribute in other form field templates # Test: Search for 'disabled' attribute in PHP files within the form-builder directory rg --type php 'disabled' admin/form-builderLength of output: 2151
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (2)
1-17: Summary of changes to the textarea field templateThe changes to this file successfully integrate Tailwind CSS and improve the form builder UI, aligning with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Enhanced styling of the textarea using Tailwind CSS classes.
- Better semantic structure for the help text.
- Improved flexibility with dynamic class binding.
However, there are a few points to address:
- Fix the typo in the
:deaultattribute.- Consider extracting the long list of Tailwind CSS classes for better maintainability.
- Ensure proper sanitization of the
field.helpcontent used withv-html.Overall, these changes represent a significant improvement to the form textarea field component.
17-17: Improved semantic structure and styling for help text.The change from
spantopfor the help text is a good improvement in terms of semantic HTML. The addition of Tailwind CSS classes enhances the styling and consistency of the help text.However, the use of
v-htmlfor rendering the help text content could potentially lead to XSS vulnerabilities if the content is not properly sanitized. Please ensure thatfield.helpis sanitized before being rendered. Consider using a custom directive or a method to sanitize the HTML content.To verify the sanitization of
field.help, please run the following script:If no sanitization is found, consider implementing a sanitization method or using a library like DOMPurify to prevent potential XSS attacks.
✅ Verification successful
Sanitization of
field.helpis properly handled.The
field.helpcontent is sanitized on the server side usingwp_kses_postandsanitize_text_field, ensuring that rendering it withv-htmldoes not introduce XSS vulnerabilities. No additional client-side sanitization is necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for HTML sanitization of field.help # Test: Search for sanitization of field.help before it's used in v-html rg --type php -A 5 $'field\.help.*=.*sanitize' # Test: Search for any custom sanitization methods or directives rg --type php -A 5 $'function.*sanitize' rg --type javascript -A 5 $'Vue\.directive.*sanitize' # If no results are found, it might indicate that sanitization is not being performedLength of output: 2811
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Vue directives related to sanitization # Search for Vue directives that involve sanitization rg --type js -A 5 'Vue\.directive.*sanitize'Length of output: 46
src/css/admin/form-builder.css (2)
1-3: LGTM: Tailwind CSS imports are correct.The Tailwind CSS imports are properly set up, following best practices by including base, components, and utilities layers.
17-33: LGTM: Custom utility classes are well-defined.The custom utility classes are properly implemented using Tailwind's
@layerdirective. They provide useful transition and transform utilities that align with Tailwind's naming conventions.package.json (3)
38-38: Syntax correction: Added comma aftervitedependency.A comma has been added after the
vitedependency to maintain valid JSON syntax. This is a necessary correction to ensure thepackage.jsonfile remains valid.
Line range hint
29-41: Summary: Dependencies added align with PR objectives.The changes made to the
package.jsonfile are consistent with the PR objectives. The addition of Tailwind CSS and related dependencies (PostCSS, Autoprefixer) supports the goal of redesigning the header section of the post form and enhancing the UI of the form builder. These tools will enable more efficient styling and maintenance of the UI components.However, it's important to note that while these changes support the UI redesign, they don't directly address the specific user request mentioned in issue #638 regarding the country dropdown in the billing address section. Additional changes in other files will be necessary to implement that feature.
Line range hint
29-41: New dependencies added for CSS processing and Tailwind integration.The following new dependencies have been added:
grunt-postcss: For PostCSS integration with Grunt.tailwindcss: For using Tailwind CSS in the project.autoprefixer: A PostCSS plugin for adding vendor prefixes to CSS.postcss: The core PostCSS library.These additions align with the PR objective of integrating Tailwind CSS into the form builder.
Let's verify if these new dependencies are being used in the project:
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-checkbox_field/template.php (1)
43-43: Help text rendering improved, but consider security implications.The update to use a
<p>element for help text is semantically more appropriate, and the Tailwind CSS classes provide consistent styling and proper spacing.However, the use of
v-htmlfor rendering the help text could potentially introduce XSS vulnerabilities if the content is not properly sanitized. Please ensure thatfield.helpis sanitized before rendering.To verify the content of
field.help, you can run the following script:If no sanitization is found, consider implementing a sanitization method or using
v-textinstead ofv-htmlif HTML rendering is not required.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php (5)
42-42: Enhance input element styling with Tailwind CSSThe addition of Tailwind CSS classes to the input element significantly improves its appearance and user interaction:
- The classes provide a consistent, modern look with appropriate padding, text color, and border styling.
- The focus state is well-defined, improving accessibility and user experience.
- The use of Tailwind's utility classes ensures consistency with other UI elements and allows for easy maintenance.
48-48: Improve help text semantics and stylingThe changes to the help text enhance both its structure and appearance:
- Changing from a
<span>to a<p>element is more semantically correct for block-level content, improving accessibility and SEO.- The addition of Tailwind CSS classes (
wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500) improves the styling and readability of the help text.These changes contribute to a more consistent and user-friendly form design.
40-41: Review input element accessibility and stylingThe changes to the input element raise some considerations:
- The
disabled="disabled"attribute prevents user input. Ensure this is the intended behavior, as it significantly impacts usability.- The class attribute now uses a dynamic
class_names('textfield')function. This approach allows for more flexible styling, but make sure the function is properly defined and returns the expected classes.To ensure the
disabledattribute and dynamic class naming are used consistently, run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of the disabled attribute and dynamic class naming in input elements # Test: Search for input elements with the disabled attribute rg --type php -A 5 '<input.*disabled.*>' # Test: Search for input elements using the class_names function rg --type php -A 5 ':class="class_names\(.*\)"'This will help verify if these patterns are applied consistently across similar input elements in the codebase.
43-44: Improve input element usability and responsivenessThe changes to the input element enhance its usability and layout:
- The addition of a dynamic placeholder (
field.placeholder) provides helpful context to users, improving the overall user experience.- Removing the
sizeattribute allows the input to be more responsive and consistent with other form elements. This is a good practice for modern, flexible layouts.To ensure placeholders are used consistently across the application, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of placeholders in input elements # Test: Search for input elements with placeholders rg --type php -A 5 '<input.*placeholder.*>'This will help verify if placeholders are applied consistently across similar input elements in the codebase.
4-8: Enhance select element styling and structureThe changes improve the select element's appearance and structure:
- The
disabledattribute prevents user interaction. Ensure this is the intended behavior, as it might affect usability.- The addition of Tailwind CSS classes enhances the styling and consistency of the select element.
- The select tag is now properly closed, improving HTML validity.
To ensure the
disabledattribute is used consistently, run the following script:This will help verify if the
disabledattribute is applied consistently across similar select elements in the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Consistent use of the
disabledattribute confirmedAll
selectelements in the codebase consistently use thedisabledattribute, ensuring uniform behavior and usability.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of the disabled attribute in select elements # Test: Search for select elements with the disabled attribute rg --type php -A 5 '<select.*disabled.*>' # Test: Search for select elements without the disabled attribute rg --type php -A 5 '<select(?!.*disabled).*>'Length of output: 42465
includes/Assets.php (3)
158-160: LGTM! Logical ordering of styles.The relocation of the 'admin' style entry after the new 'admin-form-builder' entry maintains a logical order of styles. This change doesn't affect functionality and improves code organization.
109-179: Overall assessment: Improvements in code organization and new functionality.The changes in this file are well-structured and add value to the codebase:
- Improved formatting enhances readability.
- Addition of the 'admin-form-builder' style suggests new or updated admin interface functionality.
- Logical reordering of style entries maintains good code organization.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the form builder UI. Good job!
155-157: Verify enqueuing of the new admin form builder style.The addition of the 'admin-form-builder' style is good. To ensure it's properly implemented:
- Confirm that this style is enqueued on the appropriate admin pages where the form builder is used.
- Check if there are any potential conflicts with existing styles.
To verify the usage, you can run the following script:
includes/Admin/Posting.php (1)
42-46: Consider the long-term maintenance implications of version-specific styling.The introduction of version-specific stylesheet enqueuing may lead to potential maintenance challenges:
- As the product evolves, you'll need to remember to update this condition for future versions.
- This approach might result in inconsistent styling across different versions of the plugin.
Consider the following alternatives:
- Use feature flags instead of version checks for more flexible control.
- Implement a more scalable approach to handle styling differences across versions.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (3)
413-414: LGTM: New properties added to track form stateThe addition of
isDirtyandshortcodeCopiedproperties to the Vue instance data is a good practice. These will help in managing the state of unsaved changes and clipboard actions respectively.
495-499: LGTM: Improved state management for unsaved changesThe addition of the
watchproperty forform_fieldsis a good practice. It ensures thatisDirtyis set totruewhenever form fields are modified, which can be used to prompt users about unsaved changes.Also applies to: 504-505
906-910: LGTM: Proper state reset after form saveThe addition of resetting
isDirtytofalseafter a successful form save is a good practice. This ensures that the unsaved changes state is accurately maintained.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (1)
413-414: LGTM: New data properties added for better state management.The addition of
isDirtyandshortcodeCopiedproperties to the Vue instance's data object is a good practice. These properties will help in tracking unsaved changes and managing the shortcode copy functionality state, respectively.admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-old.php (5)
1-1: LGTM!The form's opening tag is well-structured, and the variable
$form_typeis properly escaped usingesc_attr(). The use ofv-cloakand the Vue.js@submit.preventdirective enhances the user experience.
116-116: Good use of nonce field for securityThe inclusion of
wp_nonce_field( 'wpuf_form_builder_save_form', 'wpuf_form_builder_nonce' );at line 116 is a best practice for protecting form submissions against CSRF attacks.
14-14:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure proper sanitization of
$form_typein dynamic action hooksAt line 14, the
do_actionfunction uses a dynamic hook name with$form_type:do_action( "wpuf-form-builder-tabs-{$form_type}" );. Please verify that$form_typeis properly sanitized and validated to prevent potential security issues or unintended behavior due to malicious input.
45-51:⚠️ Potential issueVerify proper escaping and readability in
printfstatementsThe
printfstatements between lines 45-51 involve multiple variables and nestedsprintffunctions. Whileesc_attr()andesc_html()are used, please ensure all variables like$shortcode['type'],$shortcode['name'], and$form_idare properly sanitized and escaped to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. Additionally, consider simplifying the code for better readability and maintainability.
112-114:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure proper sanitization of
form_settings_keyAt lines 112-114, a hidden input field is set for
form_settings_key. Ensure that$form_settings_keyis properly sanitized before outputting it to the HTML to prevent potential security risks.admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (1)
120-120: Uncomment the Builder Stage ComponentThe builder stage component is commented out, which may prevent the form builder from rendering correctly.
Confirm if this is intentional. If not, uncomment the component:
-<!-- <builder-stage></builder-stage>--> + <builder-stage></builder-stage>includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (3)
51-51: Addition of action hook for 'wpuf_admin_form_builder_view'The new action hook correctly adds the
include_form_buildermethod to thewpuf_admin_form_builder_viewaction.
264-268: Correct conditional inclusion based on plugin versionThe conditional logic for including different form builder views based on the
WPUF_PRO_VERSIONis implemented appropriately.
272-272: Improved documentation fori18nmethodThe updated docblock provides clearer information about the purpose of the
i18nmethod, enhancing code readability.assets/css/admin/form-builder.css (1)
1-2991: Verify Browser Compatibility with Custom StylesSince the CSS file includes custom configurations and resets, ensure that these styles are tested across different browsers, especially older versions, to verify compatibility and consistent rendering.
Run the following script to identify any CSS properties that might not be supported in certain browsers:
This script searches for vendor-prefixed properties, which might indicate areas needing attention for cross-browser support.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (3 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (7)
310-310: Translation String 'Form Editor' Added CorrectlyThe addition of the translation string "Form Editor" is appropriate and aligns with the UI redesign enhancements.
314-314: Translation String 'Preview' Integrated SuccessfullyThe translation string "Preview" has been correctly added and reflects the intended functionality.
319-319: Translation String 'Save Form' Added CorrectlyThe inclusion of the translation string "Save Form" is appropriate and supports the form saving functionality.
323-323: Translation String 'Saving Form Data' Added CorrectlyThe translation string "Saving Form Data" is correctly implemented, providing feedback during form save operations.
332-332: Translation String 'Show Form' Added CorrectlyThe addition of "Show Form" is appropriate and aligns with the new UI elements introduced.
336-336: Ensure Consistent Use of Placeholders in Translation StringsThe translation string at line 336 is:
msgid "Click to copy %s shortcode"It includes a placeholder
%sfor the form ID. Verify that this placeholder is used consistently across similar strings and that translators are aware of its purpose.
346-346: Translation String 'Field Options' Added CorrectlyThe addition of "Field Options" accurately reflects the UI component for configuring field settings.
|
Issue Found: WPUF icon is missing
|
Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad
added
bug
needs: dev review
sapayth
added
needs: testing
and removed
bug
needs: dev review
Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad
added
bug
needs: dev review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for improved accessibility.The form structure has been improved with responsive Tailwind CSS classes and proper Vue.js directives. Great job on using
@submit.preventandv-cloak.Consider adding an
aria-labelto the form for better accessibility:<form id="wpuf-form-builder" + aria-label="WPUF Form Builder" class="wpuf-w-[calc(100%+20px)] wpuf-ml-[-20px] wpuf-form-builder-<?php echo esc_attr( $form_type ); ?>" method="post" action="" @submit.prevent="save_form_builder" v-cloak>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (1 hunks)
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (1 hunks)
- assets/js-templates/form-components.php (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php
[warning] 69-69:
Words in hook names should be separated using underscores. Expected: "wpuf_form_builder_tabs_{$form_type}", but found: "wpuf-form-builder-tabs-{$form_type}".
[warning] 74-74:
Processing form data without nonce verification.
[warning] 74-74:
Processing form data without nonce verification.
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_html_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' )
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_attr_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: $shortcodes[0]['name']
🔇 Additional comments (5)
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (5)
4-71: Great job on the header implementation!The form header section is well-structured with proper Vue.js directives for dynamic functionality. The form title editing and form switcher features are implemented effectively. The use of Tailwind CSS classes provides consistent styling and responsiveness.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection
[warning] 69-69:
Words in hook names should be separated using underscores. Expected: "wpuf_form_builder_tabs_{$form_type}", but found: "wpuf-form-builder-tabs-{$form_type}".
103-116: Well-implemented action buttons with proper state handlingThe preview and save buttons are implemented effectively with appropriate Vue.js directives for conditional rendering and event handling. The use of Tailwind CSS classes ensures consistent styling and good user experience.
Great job on providing visual feedback during the form saving process!
1-124: Overall, great improvements to the form builder interface!The changes in this file significantly enhance the form builder's user interface and functionality. The integration of Tailwind CSS for styling and Vue.js for dynamic behavior is well-executed.
Key improvements:
- Responsive and visually appealing layout
- Dynamic form title editing
- Improved form switching functionality
- Clear display of shortcodes with copy feature
- Well-structured action buttons with proper state handling
A few minor issues were identified:
- An accessibility improvement for the form element
- A potential accessibility issue with
aria-labelledby- A security concern with unescaped output
- Incorrect usage of
esc_attr_e()Please address these minor issues to further improve the code quality and security of the form builder.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection
[warning] 69-69:
Words in hook names should be separated using underscores. Expected: "wpuf_form_builder_tabs_{$form_type}", but found: "wpuf-form-builder-tabs-{$form_type}".
[warning] 74-74:
Processing form data without nonce verification.
[warning] 74-74:
Processing form data without nonce verification.
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_html_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' )
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_attr_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: $shortcodes[0]['name']
26-29:⚠️ Potential issueFix accessibility issue with
aria-labelledbyattributeThe
aria-labelledbyattribute references a non-existent element ID, which may impact accessibility for users relying on assistive technologies.To resolve this, either add an
id="menu-button"to the relevant element that labels the menu, or usearia-labelto provide a label directly:- aria-labelledby="menu-button" + aria-label="Form Switcher"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
117-124: Good layout structure. Clarification needed on builder stage implementation.The form content section is well-structured using Tailwind CSS grid classes for a two-column layout.
Could you please clarify the status of the builder stage implementation? The
<builder-stage>component is currently commented out. Is this intentional for this PR, or should it be uncommented?✅ Verification successful
Builder stage component is defined in the codebase. The commented-out
<builder-stage>in this section is intentional.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the builder-stage component is defined elsewhere in the project rg -g '*.{php,js,vue}' -i 'builder-stage'Length of output: 1386
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| ?> | ||
| <span class="form-id wpuf-group wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-py-2 wpuf-px-4 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border wpuf-border-slate-300 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer" title="<?php esc_html_e( __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); ?>" data-clipboard-text="<?php '[' . esc_attr_e( $shortcodes[0]['name'] ) . ' id="' . esc_attr( $form_id ) . '"]'; ?>">#{{ post.ID }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect usage of esc_attr_e() function
The esc_attr_e() function is used incorrectly in the data-clipboard-text attribute. This function echoes the escaped string rather than returning it, which can lead to unexpected output.
Replace esc_attr_e() with esc_attr() and ensure the string is properly concatenated:
- data-clipboard-text="<?php '[' . esc_attr_e( $shortcodes[0]['name'] ) . ' id="' . esc_attr( $form_id ) . '"]'; ?>"
+ data-clipboard-text="<?php echo esc_attr( '[' . $shortcodes[0]['name'] . ' id="' . $form_id . '"]' ); ?>"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <span class="form-id wpuf-group wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-py-2 wpuf-px-4 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border wpuf-border-slate-300 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer" title="<?php esc_html_e( __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); ?>" data-clipboard-text="<?php '[' . esc_attr_e( $shortcodes[0]['name'] ) . ' id="' . esc_attr( $form_id ) . '"]'; ?>">#{{ post.ID }} | |
| <span class="form-id wpuf-group wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-py-2 wpuf-px-4 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border wpuf-border-slate-300 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer" title="<?php esc_html_e( __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); ?>" data-clipboard-text="<?php echo esc_attr( '[' . $shortcodes[0]['name'] . ' id="' . $form_id . '"]' ); ?>">#{{ post.ID }} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Run PHPCS inspection
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_html_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: __( 'Click to copy shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' )
[failure] 83-83:
Missing $domain parameter in function call to esc_attr_e().
[failure] 83-83:
The $text parameter must be a single text string literal. Found: $shortcodes[0]['name']
| if ( count( $shortcodes ) > 1 && isset( $shortcodes[0]['type'] ) ) { | ||
| foreach ( $shortcodes as $shortcode ) { | ||
| /* translators: %s: form id */ | ||
| printf( "<span class=\"form-id\" title=\"%s\" data-clipboard-text='%s'><i class=\"fa fa-clipboard\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></i> %s: #{{ post.ID }}</span>", sprintf( esc_html( __( 'Click to copy %s shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) ), sprintf( '[%s type="%s" id="%s"]', esc_attr( $shortcode['name'] ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ), esc_attr( $form_id ) ), esc_attr( ucwords( $shortcode['type'] ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Use esc_attr() for attribute values
The printf statement outputs unescaped content, which could lead to potential XSS vulnerabilities.
Modify the line to use esc_attr() for all attribute values:
- printf( "<span class=\"form-id\" title=\"%s\" data-clipboard-text='%s'><i class=\"fa fa-clipboard\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></i> %s: #{{ post.ID }}</span>", sprintf( esc_html( __( 'Click to copy %s shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) ), sprintf( '[%s type="%s" id="%s"]', esc_attr( $shortcode['name'] ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ), esc_attr( $form_id ) ), esc_attr( ucwords( $shortcode['type'] ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) );
+ printf( "<span class=\"form-id\" title=\"%s\" data-clipboard-text='%s'><i class=\"fa fa-clipboard\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></i> %s: #{{ post.ID }}</span>", esc_attr( sprintf( __( 'Click to copy %s shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ), $shortcode['type'] ) ), esc_attr( sprintf( '[%s type="%s" id="%s"]', $shortcode['name'], $shortcode['type'], $form_id ) ), esc_html( ucwords( $shortcode['type'] ) ) );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| printf( "<span class=\"form-id\" title=\"%s\" data-clipboard-text='%s'><i class=\"fa fa-clipboard\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></i> %s: #{{ post.ID }}</span>", sprintf( esc_html( __( 'Click to copy %s shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) ), sprintf( '[%s type="%s" id="%s"]', esc_attr( $shortcode['name'] ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ), esc_attr( $form_id ) ), esc_attr( ucwords( $shortcode['type'] ) ), esc_attr( $shortcode['type'] ) ); | |
| printf( "<span class=\"form-id\" title=\"%s\" data-clipboard-text='%s'><i class=\"fa fa-clipboard\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></i> %s: #{{ post.ID }}</span>", esc_attr( sprintf( __( 'Click to copy %s shortcode', 'wp-user-frontend' ), $shortcode['type'] ) ), esc_attr( sprintf( '[%s type="%s" id="%s"]', $shortcode['name'], $shortcode['type'], $form_id ) ), esc_html( ucwords( $shortcode['type'] ) ) ); |
| :default="field.default" | ||
| :rows="field.rows" | ||
| :cols="field.cols" | ||
| >{{ field.default }}</textarea> | ||
| :class="class_names('textareafield')" | ||
| class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6">{{ field.default }}</textarea> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use v-model instead of :default in <textarea>
The :default binding is not standard for <textarea> elements in Vue.js. To bind the default value, you should use v-model instead of :default.
Apply this diff to fix the binding:
<textarea
v-if="'no' === field.rich"
:placeholder="field.placeholder"
- :default="field.default"
+ v-model="field.default"
:rows="field.rows"
:cols="field.cols"
:class="class_names('textareafield')"
class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6">{{ field.default }}</textarea>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| :default="field.default" | |
| :rows="field.rows" | |
| :cols="field.cols" | |
| >{{ field.default }}</textarea> | |
| :class="class_names('textareafield')" | |
| class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6">{{ field.default }}</textarea> | |
| v-model="field.default" | |
| :rows="field.rows" | |
| :cols="field.cols" | |
| :class="class_names('textareafield')" | |
| class="wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-border-0 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-inset focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6">{{ field.default }}</textarea> |
| <div | ||
| v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" | ||
| class="wpuf-space-y-5"> | ||
| <div | ||
| v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | ||
| class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start"> | ||
| <div class="wpuf-items-center"> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="checkbox" | ||
| :value="val" | ||
| :checked="is_selected(val)" | ||
| :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | ||
| > {{ label }} | ||
| </label> | ||
| </li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm"> | ||
| <label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help" /> | ||
| <div | ||
| v-if="field.inline === 'yes'" | ||
| class="wpuf-flex" | ||
| > | ||
| <div | ||
| v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | ||
| class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start wpuf-mr-4"> | ||
| <div class="wpuf-items-center"> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="checkbox" | ||
| :value="val" | ||
| :checked="is_selected(val)" | ||
| :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | ||
| class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm"> | ||
| <label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to eliminate code duplication
The code blocks for rendering checkboxes when field.inline is 'yes' and when it's not are very similar. Refactoring to merge these two blocks can reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
You can combine the two conditional blocks and adjust classes or styles based on the field.inline condition. Here's a suggested refactor:
<div
:class="field.inline === 'yes' ? 'wpuf-flex' : 'wpuf-space-y-5'"
>
<div
v-if="has_options"
v-for="(label, val) in field.options"
:class="field.inline === 'yes' ? 'wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start wpuf-mr-4' : 'wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start'"
>
<div class="wpuf-items-center">
<input
type="checkbox"
:value="val"
:checked="is_selected(val)"
:class="class_names('checkbox_btns')"
class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"
>
</div>
<div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm">
<label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label>
</div>
</div>
</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div | |
| v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" | |
| class="wpuf-space-y-5"> | |
| <div | |
| v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
| class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start"> | |
| <div class="wpuf-items-center"> | |
| <input | |
| type="checkbox" | |
| :value="val" | |
| :checked="is_selected(val)" | |
| :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | |
| > {{ label }} | |
| </label> | |
| </li> | |
| </ul> | |
| class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm"> | |
| <label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help" /> | |
| <div | |
| v-if="field.inline === 'yes'" | |
| class="wpuf-flex" | |
| > | |
| <div | |
| v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
| class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start wpuf-mr-4"> | |
| <div class="wpuf-items-center"> | |
| <input | |
| type="checkbox" | |
| :value="val" | |
| :checked="is_selected(val)" | |
| :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | |
| class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600"> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm"> | |
| <label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> | |
| <div | |
| :class="field.inline === 'yes' ? 'wpuf-flex' : 'wpuf-space-y-5'" | |
| > | |
| <div | |
| v-if="has_options" | |
| v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
| :class="field.inline === 'yes' ? 'wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start wpuf-mr-4' : 'wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-start'" | |
| > | |
| <div class="wpuf-items-center"> | |
| <input | |
| type="checkbox" | |
| :value="val" | |
| :checked="is_selected(val)" | |
| :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | |
| class="wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600 focus:wpuf-ring-indigo-600" | |
| > | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm"> | |
| <label class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad
added
QA Approved
…or_form_builder_ui_redesign
fixes #638
re-design of the header part of a post form.
sub-tasks
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
These updates significantly enhance the user experience and visual consistency across the application.