-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial: use Infra list syntax in mutations #762
Conversation
As pointed out at #695 (review) it would be nice if this were more consistent.
<li><p>If <var>node</var> is {{DocumentFragment}} <a>node</a>, then set <var>addedNodes</var> to | ||
<var>node</var>'s <a>children</a>. | ||
|
||
<li><p>Otherwise, if <var>node</var> is non-null, set <var>addedNodes</var> to « <var>node</var> ». |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@domenic this is the only change that felt a little weird here due to it getting so much longer, but it's probably better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this matches the code better. Nested ternaries are not great in either English or code, IMO. You could also use dl class="switch".
dom.bs
Outdated
a {{DocumentFragment}} <a>node</a>, and a | ||
list containing solely <var>node</var> otherwise. | ||
<li><p>Let <var>nodes</var> be <var>node</var>'s <a>children</a>, if <var>node</var> is a | ||
{{DocumentFragment}} <a>node</a>, « <var>node</var> » otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reads really wrong; I'm not happy with where we've landed if this is what happens. Commas just don't work that way. Semicolon could work, or using a conjunction (either "and" or "or").
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same if otherwise comes first? I see now I put them wrong way around. I guess I can do some follow-up on Monday in that original thread on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see. If otherwise comes first it isn't as viscerally wrong, but I still have a slight preference for a conjunction or semicolon.
<li><p>If <var>node</var> is {{DocumentFragment}} <a>node</a>, then set <var>addedNodes</var> to | ||
<var>node</var>'s <a>children</a>. | ||
|
||
<li><p>Otherwise, if <var>node</var> is non-null, set <var>addedNodes</var> to « <var>node</var> ». |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this matches the code better. Nested ternaries are not great in either English or code, IMO. You could also use dl class="switch".
As pointed out at #695 (review) it would be nice if this were more consistent.
Preview | Diff