Support scim group patch call when only value attribute is present for members. #391
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
PR builder started |
|
PR builder completed |
jenkins-is-staging
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/6098982753
|
Since the behavior is getting differ in different each product version can you arrange a review session? |
|
Since the behaviour has changed in the latest version of the product, this change is not required. Hence, closing the issue. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, we expect both
displayandvalueattributes to be present to update a group with a user during an add operation. With this implementation, the display attribute is made optional and a group can be updated with a user by providing the userId as the value for the value attribute.Related issue: