Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boundary condition didn't work #29

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

boundary condition didn't work #29

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

yomichi
Copy link
Owner

@yomichi yomichi commented Jun 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved bond handling logic to ensure correct bond creation based on source and target offsets. This includes verifying source offsets, calculating target coordinates, and ensuring coordinates are within bounds.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the generatelattice_std function within src/lattice/generate.jl focus on refining the bond-handling logic. The updates simplify the bond source offset check and restructure the bond creation process by verifying source and target offsets, calculating target coordinates, and ensuring they are within bounds before creating bonds.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/lattice/generate.jl Modified the generatelattice_std function to simplify bond source offset checks and restructure bond creation based on source and target offsets.

Poem

In the lattice of code, bonds now align,
Simplified checks make the logic shine.
Coordinates dance within bounds so true,
Creating connections, both old and new.
🐇✨ CodeRabbit hops with glee,
For lattice bonds now flow with ease!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 152de42 and 26c0184.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lattice/generate.jl (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/lattice/generate.jl (1)

Line range hint 9-11: Ensure compatibility with changes in generatelattice_std.

The changes in generatelattice_std might affect other functions that deal with lattice generation and manipulation. It is crucial to ensure that these functions are compatible with the new boundary condition checks and coordinate calculations. Please verify that the logic in these functions aligns with the changes and that there are no unintended side effects.

Also applies to: 18-20, 28-30, 38-40, 48-50, 58-60, 68-70, 78-80, 88-90, 98-100, 108-110, 118-120

Comment on lines 122 to 136
if any(bond.source.offset .!= 0)
error("offset in source should be zero")
end
target_coord = cellcoord .+ bond.target.offset
if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| bc)
source = numsites_in_cell * cellcoord + bond.source.id
target = numsites_in_cell *
coord2index(cellcoord .+ bond.target.offset, L) + bond.target.id
dir = latvec * ((bond.target.offset .+ usites[bond.target.id].coord)
.-
(bond.source.offset .+ usites[bond.source.id].coord))
ib += 1
b = Bond(ib, ifelse(use_index_as_bondtype, ib, bond.bondtype), source,
target, dir)
push!(bonds, b)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The coord2index function does not handle negative coordinates explicitly. It uses the mod function to wrap coordinates within the bounds of L, which may not be sufficient for all cases, especially when dealing with negative offsets.

  • The error message in line 123 should be more descriptive.
  • The boundary condition check in line 126 should be corrected to ensure proper logic.

Consider the following improvements:

- error("offset in source should be zero")
+ error("Offset in source should be zero. Found offset: $(bond.source.offset)")

- if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| bc)
+ if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| (bc && all(target_coord .>= 0)))

Please review and apply these changes to ensure proper handling of boundary conditions and coordinate calculations.

Analysis chain

Refine boundary condition checks and bond creation logic.

The changes introduced in lines 122-136 add necessary checks for boundary conditions and coordinate calculations. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The error message in line 123 is not very descriptive. It would be beneficial to include more context about why the offset should be zero.
  2. The calculation of target in lines 128-129 uses coord2index which might not handle negative coordinates correctly if bond.target.offset is negative. This needs verification.
  3. The condition in line 126 checks if the target coordinate is within bounds or if the boundary condition is periodic. The use of .|| bc seems incorrect as it will always return true if bc is true, regardless of the coordinate values. This should be corrected to ensure that the boundary condition logic is applied correctly.

Consider the following improvements:

- error("offset in source should be zero")
+ error("Offset in source should be zero. Found offset: $(bond.source.offset)")

- if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| bc)
+ if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| (bc && all(target_coord .>= 0)))
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify handling of negative coordinates in `coord2index`.

# Test: Search for negative coordinate handling in `coord2index`. Expect: Proper handling or an error.
rg --type julia $'coord2index' src/lattice/generate.jl

Length of output: 204



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the implementation of `coord2index` function from `src/lattice/generate.jl`.

# Locate and extract the implementation of `coord2index`.
ast-grep --lang julia --pattern $'function coord2index($_, $_) { $$$ }' src/lattice/generate.jl

Length of output: 207



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the implementation of `coord2index` function in `src/lattice/generate.jl`.

# Search for the definition of `coord2index` function.
rg 'function coord2index' src/lattice/generate.jl

Length of output: 112



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full implementation of `coord2index` function in `src/lattice/generate.jl`.

# Extract the lines following the function definition to capture the full implementation.
rg -A 20 'function coord2index' src/lattice/generate.jl

Length of output: 534

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26c0184 and 35607d1.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lattice/generate.jl (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +122 to +124
if any(bond.source.offset .!= 0)
error("offset in source should be zero")
end
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarify the error message for better debugging.

The error message "offset in source should be zero" could be more informative. Consider including the actual offset value in the message to aid in debugging:

- error("offset in source should be zero")
+ error("Offset in source should be zero. Found offset: $(bond.source.offset)")
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if any(bond.source.offset .!= 0)
error("offset in source should be zero")
end
if any(bond.source.offset .!= 0)
error("Offset in source should be zero. Found offset: $(bond.source.offset)")
end

Comment on lines 126 to 136
if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .| bc)
source = numsites_in_cell * cellcoord + bond.source.id
target = numsites_in_cell *
coord2index(cellcoord .+ bond.target.offset, L) + bond.target.id
dir = latvec * ((bond.target.offset .+ usites[bond.target.id].coord)
.-
(bond.source.offset .+ usites[bond.source.id].coord))
ib += 1
b = Bond(ib, ifelse(use_index_as_bondtype, ib, bond.bondtype), source,
target, dir)
push!(bonds, b)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refine the boundary condition check and bond creation logic.

The boundary condition check in line 126 uses .| bc which might not behave as intended if bc is true, regardless of the coordinate values. This could lead to incorrect bond creation. Consider refining this logic to ensure that the boundary condition is applied correctly:

- if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .| bc)
+ if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| (bc && all(target_coord .>= 0)))

Additionally, ensure that the bond creation process in lines 128-136 correctly handles the indices and coordinates, especially when negative offsets are involved.

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .| bc)
source = numsites_in_cell * cellcoord + bond.source.id
target = numsites_in_cell *
coord2index(cellcoord .+ bond.target.offset, L) + bond.target.id
dir = latvec * ((bond.target.offset .+ usites[bond.target.id].coord)
.-
(bond.source.offset .+ usites[bond.source.id].coord))
ib += 1
b = Bond(ib, ifelse(use_index_as_bondtype, ib, bond.bondtype), source,
target, dir)
push!(bonds, b)
if all((0 .<= target_coord .< L) .|| (bc && all(target_coord .>= 0)))
source = numsites_in_cell * cellcoord + bond.source.id
target = numsites_in_cell *
coord2index(cellcoord .+ bond.target.offset, L) + bond.target.id
dir = latvec * ((bond.target.offset .+ usites[bond.target.id].coord)
.-
(bond.source.offset .+ usites[bond.source.id].coord))
ib += 1
b = Bond(ib, ifelse(use_index_as_bondtype, ib, bond.bondtype), source,
target, dir)
push!(bonds, b)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35607d1 and 5a01c83.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lattice/generate.jl (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/lattice/generate.jl

@yomichi yomichi merged commit 6756938 into main Jun 10, 2024
10 checks passed
@yomichi yomichi deleted the fix_boundary_condition branch June 10, 2024 04:42
@yomichi yomichi mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant