Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename SetByIndex to ArraySet #995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Rename SetByIndex to ArraySet #995

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

hackerwins
Copy link
Member

@hackerwins hackerwins commented Sep 3, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Rename SetByIndex to ArraySet

Related to #985

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Additional documentation:


Checklist:

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new operation type, ArraySet, enhancing the API's capability to handle array operations.
    • Added a new method to set elements based on creation time in the Array struct.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated internal logic to ensure correct processing of the new ArraySet operation.
  • Documentation

    • Updated OpenAPI specifications to reflect the introduction of ArraySet and removal of SetByIndex.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed existing methods and structures to align with the new ArraySet operation, improving clarity and consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new operation type, ArraySet, replacing the previous SetByIndex operation across multiple files. This includes updates to function signatures, OpenAPI specifications, and internal logic to reflect the new operation. The modifications aim to streamline how operations are represented and processed within the codebase, impacting both the API and the underlying data structures.

Changes

Files Change Summary
api/converter/from_pb.go, api/converter/to_pb.go Renamed functions and modified operation types from SetByIndex to ArraySet, updating parameter and return types accordingly.
api/docs/yorkie/v1/*.yaml Added yorkie.v1.Operation.ArraySet schema and removed yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex, reflecting the new operation type in the OpenAPI specifications.
api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto Renamed SetByIndex message to ArraySet and updated references within the Operation message structure.
pkg/document/crdt/array.go Introduced a new method Set to manage elements based on creation time, replacing the removed SetByIndex method.
pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go Renamed SetByIndex method to Set, clarifying its purpose related to creation time rather than indexing.
pkg/document/json/array.go Updated internal logic to reflect the new operation name ArraySet, replacing previous references to SetByIndex.
pkg/document/operations/array_set.go Renamed SetByIndex operation to ArraySet, updating all related method signatures and internal logic to align with the new naming convention.

Possibly related issues

  • Roadmap for Array #990: The changes address the need for a roadmap focused on SetByIndex operations, which has now transitioned to ArraySet, providing clarity on future development directions.

🐰 "In fields of code, I hop with glee,
New ArraySet operations, oh so free!
Old ways replaced, with a hop and a skip,
A fresh path forward, let’s take this trip!
With each little change, our code will bloom,
A garden of logic, dispelling the gloom!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

@hackerwins hackerwins added the cleanup 🧹 Paying off technical debt label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 50.84%. Comparing base (d07ce02) to head (9ec0572).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/document/crdt/array.go 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
api/converter/to_pb.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
api/converter/from_pb.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #995   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.84%   50.84%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       10855    10855           
=======================================
  Hits         5519     5519           
  Misses       4787     4787           
  Partials      549      549           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hackerwins hackerwins marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 05:59
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d07ce02 and 9ec0572.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • api/yorkie/v1/resources.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (10)
  • api/converter/from_pb.go (3 hunks)
  • api/converter/to_pb.go (2 hunks)
  • api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
  • api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
  • api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
  • api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (2 hunks)
  • pkg/document/crdt/array.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/document/json/array.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/document/operations/array_set.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (20)
pkg/document/operations/array_set.go (4)

24-25: LGTM!

The struct renaming from SetByIndex to ArraySet aligns the name with its functionality and improves clarity.


39-46: LGTM!

The constructor function renaming from NewSetByIndex to NewArraySet aligns the name with the struct name and improves consistency.


80-101: LGTM!

The renaming of the remaining methods (Value, ParentCreatedAt, ExecutedAt, SetActor, and CreatedAt) to reflect the new struct name aligns the names with the struct name and improves consistency.


Line range hint 55-68: Verify the impact of the change in the underlying implementation.

The method renaming from (o *SetByIndex) Execute to (o *ArraySet) Execute aligns the name with the struct name and improves consistency.

The update to the method calls within the Execute function indicates a potential change in the underlying implementation of how elements are set in the array. Ensure that this change does not introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.

Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: No Issues Found with ArraySet Implementation

The ArraySet operation is thoroughly tested across multiple test cases, ensuring that the Set method behaves as expected. The change in the underlying implementation does not introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.

  • Test cases such as TestArraySetTypeGuard, TestArraySet, and TestArraySetByIndex cover various scenarios for the ArraySet operation.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the change in the underlying implementation.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `Set` method. Expect: No breaking changes or unexpected behavior.
rg --type go -A 5 $'Set\('

Length of output: 21131


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test cases related to `ArraySet` and verify their comprehensiveness.

# Find all test files that mention `ArraySet`.
rg --type go -l 'ArraySet' | xargs -I {} rg --type go -A 5 'ArraySet' {}

Length of output: 7859

pkg/document/crdt/array.go (1)

182-191: LGTM!

The Set method is implemented correctly:

  • It sets the given element at the given position based on the creation time by calling the Set method of the underlying RGATreeList.
  • It handles the error and returns the old element and the error.
  • The method signature and behavior match the description in the summary.

The code changes are approved.

api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (2)

Line range hint 139-144: LGTM!

The message has been renamed from SetByIndex to ArraySet, which is consistent with the PR objective. The message structure remains unchanged.


157-157: LGTM!

The field has been renamed from set_by_index to array_set and its type has been updated to reference the new ArraySet message. This change is consistent with the message renaming.

pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go (2)

349-350: LGTM: The function signature change improves clarity.

The function name change from SetByIndex to Set enhances the clarity of the function's purpose by removing the misleading "ByIndex" suffix, as the function sets an element by creation time, not by index.

Although this is a breaking change, it is an improvement in terms of naming and doesn't alter the behavior.


357-357: LGTM: The error message change is consistent with the function name change.

The error message change from "SetByIndex" to "set" aligns with the function name change and doesn't introduce any issues.

pkg/document/json/array.go (1)

424-424: Approve the renaming of NewSetByIndex to NewArraySet and SetByIndex to Set.

The changes seem to be intentional refactoring to refine the naming and possibly the implementation of the setByIndexInternal method.

Verify that the NewArraySet operation and the Set method are correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase by running the following script:

Also applies to: 431-431

Verification successful

The usage of NewArraySet and Set is correct and consistent throughout the codebase.

The refactoring changes appear to be intentional and align with the expected usage patterns for these functions and methods. No issues were found in their implementation or usage.

  • NewArraySet is used in pkg/document/json/array.go and api/converter/from_pb.go.
  • Set is used in various files, including pkg/document/json/array.go and pkg/document/crdt/array.go.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `NewArraySet` and `Set` in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `NewArraySet`. Expect: Only correct usages.
rg --type go -A 5 $'operations\.NewArraySet'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of `Set` method. Expect: Only correct usages.
rg --type go -A 5 $'\.Set\('

Length of output: 13917

api/converter/to_pb.go (2)

Line range hint 380-393: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The toArraySet function correctly handles the conversion of the ArraySet operation from the model format to the Protobuf format.


209-210: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The ToOperations function correctly handles the change in operation type from SetByIndex to ArraySet.

api/converter/from_pb.go (2)

211-212: LGTM!

The case statement has been updated to handle the Operation_ArraySet_ type, which is consistent with the renaming of SetByIndex to ArraySet.


Line range hint 544-561: Looks good!

The fromSetByIndex function has been appropriately renamed to fromArraySet, and the parameter and return types have been updated to match the new ArraySet operation type. The internal logic remains the same, with only the names changed to reflect the new type.

api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml (2)

Line range hint 667-788: LGTM!

The addition of the yorkie.v1.Operation.ArraySet schema is approved. It enhances the API's capability to handle array operations by providing a structured representation for array set operations. The schema is well-defined and references existing schemas for its properties, ensuring consistency and reusability.


Line range hint 1-1: Verify the impact of removing the yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema.

Ensure that the removal of the yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema does not break any existing functionality or cause any compatibility issues for clients using the API.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the removed schema:

Verification successful

No impact from the removal of yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema.

The yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema is not referenced anywhere in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not affect existing functionality or cause compatibility issues.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the removed `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema.

# Test: Search for the schema usage. Expect: No occurrences of the removed schema.
rg --type yaml $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

Length of output: 52


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the removed `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema across all file types.

# Test: Search for the schema usage in the entire codebase. Expect: No occurrences of the removed schema.
rg 'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

Length of output: 40

api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (2)

683-688: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


775-804: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (2)

Line range hint 1174-1295: LGTM!

The addition of the yorkie.v1.Operation.ArraySet schema is approved. It enhances the API's capability to handle array set operations and provides a clear structure for the data involved. The schema is well-defined and uses existing schemas for its properties, ensuring consistency and reusability.


Line range hint 1-2000: Verify the impact of removing the yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema.

The removal of the yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema suggests that its functionality may have been deemed redundant or less relevant in the context of the current API design. Please ensure that the removal does not break any existing functionality or integrations.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema:

Verification successful

Removal of yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex Schema Verified

The yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex schema is not referenced in the codebase or documentation, confirming that its removal does not impact existing functionality or integrations. The schema was likely deprecated or unused.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema.

# Test: Search for the schema usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

Length of output: 55


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema in other file types.

# Search for the schema usage in YAML files.
rg --type yaml -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

# Search for the schema usage in Markdown files.
rg --type md -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

# Search for the schema usage in JSON files.
rg --type json -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'

Length of output: 171

@hackerwins hackerwins merged commit 2f93922 into main Sep 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@hackerwins hackerwins deleted the revise-array-set branch September 3, 2024 06:06
raararaara pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup 🧹 Paying off technical debt
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant