-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename SetByIndex to ArraySet #995
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new operation type, Changes
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #995 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 50.84% 50.84%
=======================================
Files 73 73
Lines 10855 10855
=======================================
Hits 5519 5519
Misses 4787 4787
Partials 549 549 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/resources.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (10)
- api/converter/from_pb.go (3 hunks)
- api/converter/to_pb.go (2 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml (4 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (2 hunks)
- pkg/document/crdt/array.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/document/json/array.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/document/operations/array_set.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (20)
pkg/document/operations/array_set.go (4)
24-25
: LGTM!The struct renaming from
SetByIndex
toArraySet
aligns the name with its functionality and improves clarity.
39-46
: LGTM!The constructor function renaming from
NewSetByIndex
toNewArraySet
aligns the name with the struct name and improves consistency.
80-101
: LGTM!The renaming of the remaining methods (
Value
,ParentCreatedAt
,ExecutedAt
,SetActor
, andCreatedAt
) to reflect the new struct name aligns the names with the struct name and improves consistency.
Line range hint
55-68
: Verify the impact of the change in the underlying implementation.The method renaming from
(o *SetByIndex) Execute
to(o *ArraySet) Execute
aligns the name with the struct name and improves consistency.The update to the method calls within the
Execute
function indicates a potential change in the underlying implementation of how elements are set in the array. Ensure that this change does not introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:
Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Issues Found with
ArraySet
ImplementationThe
ArraySet
operation is thoroughly tested across multiple test cases, ensuring that theSet
method behaves as expected. The change in the underlying implementation does not introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.
- Test cases such as
TestArraySetTypeGuard
,TestArraySet
, andTestArraySetByIndex
cover various scenarios for theArraySet
operation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change in the underlying implementation. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Set` method. Expect: No breaking changes or unexpected behavior. rg --type go -A 5 $'Set\('Length of output: 21131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test cases related to `ArraySet` and verify their comprehensiveness. # Find all test files that mention `ArraySet`. rg --type go -l 'ArraySet' | xargs -I {} rg --type go -A 5 'ArraySet' {}Length of output: 7859
pkg/document/crdt/array.go (1)
182-191
: LGTM!The
Set
method is implemented correctly:
- It sets the given element at the given position based on the creation time by calling the
Set
method of the underlyingRGATreeList
.- It handles the error and returns the old element and the error.
- The method signature and behavior match the description in the summary.
The code changes are approved.
api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (2)
Line range hint
139-144
: LGTM!The message has been renamed from
SetByIndex
toArraySet
, which is consistent with the PR objective. The message structure remains unchanged.
157-157
: LGTM!The field has been renamed from
set_by_index
toarray_set
and its type has been updated to reference the newArraySet
message. This change is consistent with the message renaming.pkg/document/crdt/rga_tree_list.go (2)
349-350
: LGTM: The function signature change improves clarity.The function name change from
SetByIndex
toSet
enhances the clarity of the function's purpose by removing the misleading "ByIndex" suffix, as the function sets an element by creation time, not by index.Although this is a breaking change, it is an improvement in terms of naming and doesn't alter the behavior.
357-357
: LGTM: The error message change is consistent with the function name change.The error message change from "SetByIndex" to "set" aligns with the function name change and doesn't introduce any issues.
pkg/document/json/array.go (1)
424-424
: Approve the renaming ofNewSetByIndex
toNewArraySet
andSetByIndex
toSet
.The changes seem to be intentional refactoring to refine the naming and possibly the implementation of the
setByIndexInternal
method.Verify that the
NewArraySet
operation and theSet
method are correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase by running the following script:Also applies to: 431-431
Verification successful
The usage of
NewArraySet
andSet
is correct and consistent throughout the codebase.The refactoring changes appear to be intentional and align with the expected usage patterns for these functions and methods. No issues were found in their implementation or usage.
NewArraySet
is used inpkg/document/json/array.go
andapi/converter/from_pb.go
.Set
is used in various files, includingpkg/document/json/array.go
andpkg/document/crdt/array.go
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `NewArraySet` and `Set` in the codebase. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `NewArraySet`. Expect: Only correct usages. rg --type go -A 5 $'operations\.NewArraySet' # Test 2: Search for the usage of `Set` method. Expect: Only correct usages. rg --type go -A 5 $'\.Set\('Length of output: 13917
api/converter/to_pb.go (2)
Line range hint
380-393
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
toArraySet
function correctly handles the conversion of theArraySet
operation from the model format to the Protobuf format.
209-210
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
ToOperations
function correctly handles the change in operation type fromSetByIndex
toArraySet
.api/converter/from_pb.go (2)
211-212
: LGTM!The case statement has been updated to handle the
Operation_ArraySet_
type, which is consistent with the renaming ofSetByIndex
toArraySet
.
Line range hint
544-561
: Looks good!The
fromSetByIndex
function has been appropriately renamed tofromArraySet
, and the parameter and return types have been updated to match the newArraySet
operation type. The internal logic remains the same, with only the names changed to reflect the new type.api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml (2)
Line range hint
667-788
: LGTM!The addition of the
yorkie.v1.Operation.ArraySet
schema is approved. It enhances the API's capability to handle array operations by providing a structured representation for array set operations. The schema is well-defined and references existing schemas for its properties, ensuring consistency and reusability.
Line range hint
1-1
: Verify the impact of removing theyorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema.Ensure that the removal of the
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema does not break any existing functionality or cause any compatibility issues for clients using the API.Run the following script to verify the usage of the removed schema:
Verification successful
No impact from the removal of
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema.The
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema is not referenced anywhere in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not affect existing functionality or cause compatibility issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the removed `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema. # Test: Search for the schema usage. Expect: No occurrences of the removed schema. rg --type yaml $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the removed `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema across all file types. # Test: Search for the schema usage in the entire codebase. Expect: No occurrences of the removed schema. rg 'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'Length of output: 40
api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (2)
683-688
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
775-804
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1174-1295
: LGTM!The addition of the
yorkie.v1.Operation.ArraySet
schema is approved. It enhances the API's capability to handle array set operations and provides a clear structure for the data involved. The schema is well-defined and uses existing schemas for its properties, ensuring consistency and reusability.
Line range hint
1-2000
: Verify the impact of removing theyorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema.The removal of the
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema suggests that its functionality may have been deemed redundant or less relevant in the context of the current API design. Please ensure that the removal does not break any existing functionality or integrations.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema:Verification successful
Removal of
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
Schema VerifiedThe
yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex
schema is not referenced in the codebase or documentation, confirming that its removal does not impact existing functionality or integrations. The schema was likely deprecated or unused.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema. # Test: Search for the schema usage. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `yorkie.v1.Operation.SetByIndex` schema in other file types. # Search for the schema usage in YAML files. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex' # Search for the schema usage in Markdown files. rg --type md -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex' # Search for the schema usage in JSON files. rg --type json -A 5 $'yorkie\.v1\.Operation\.SetByIndex'Length of output: 171
What this PR does / why we need it:
Rename SetByIndex to ArraySet
Related to #985
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ArraySet
, enhancing the API's capability to handle array operations.Array
struct.Bug Fixes
ArraySet
operation.Documentation
ArraySet
and removal ofSetByIndex
.Refactor
ArraySet
operation, improving clarity and consistency.