Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dts: Update -pinctrl.dtsi files vs latest CubeMx version (6.11.0) #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

erwango
Copy link
Member

@erwango erwango commented May 23, 2024

Generate a new batch of -pinctrl.dtsi files based on 77c78c77ada5160c4891aef13cfd02cf1c87be27 sha1 of
https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32_open_pin_data

Copy link
Collaborator

@gautierg-st gautierg-st left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the pinctrl for H7R/S be inside the H7 folder and not in its own h7rs folder?
And should they be added in this PR and not in #201?

@erwango
Copy link
Member Author

erwango commented May 23, 2024

Should the pinctrl for H7R/S be inside the H7 folder and not in its own h7rs folder?

The easiest is to fit with what is provided in CubeMX database. Using h7 is fine to me.
If users are lost we'll be able to adjust.

And should they be added in this PR and not in #201?

Yes, removed.

@erwango
Copy link
Member Author

erwango commented May 23, 2024

Blocked by #204

@erwango erwango added the DNM label May 23, 2024
Generate a new batch of -pinctrl.dtsi files based on
77c78c77ada5160c4891aef13cfd02cf1c87be27 sha1 of
https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32_open_pin_data

Note: stm32h7rs parts are missing since series is not yet ported on
Zephyr

Signed-off-by: Erwan Gouriou <erwan.gouriou@st.com>
@erwango erwango force-pushed the pinctrl_cubemx_6_11_0 branch from e72924b to 025ab67 Compare May 23, 2024 16:52
@erwango erwango requested a review from gautierg-st May 23, 2024 16:52
@erwango erwango merged commit 0dca3c5 into zephyrproject-rtos:main May 24, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants