Add the DT_MEMORY_ATTR_ defines
#60874
Conversation
Add a dt-bindings header file to be able to easily match in C code the YAML / DT enum. Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
Instead of relying on numerical values only. Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
carlocaione
requested review from
dcpleung,
andyross,
nashif,
carlescufi,
galak and
MaureenHelm
as code owners
zephyrbot
added
area: Kernel
area: Devicetree Binding
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_RAM, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_RAM_NOCACHE, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_FLASH, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_PPB, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ppb? maybe add a comment, since I've got no clue what PPB is ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@galak replying here also for the other comment.
Agree, naming and description is a big issue here. @manuargue will be taking care of that soon, see #60049 (review) and #60049 (comment) but I think we are forced to live with it for a little while, but cleaning up is already planned I swear :)
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_FLASH, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_PPB, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_IO, | ||
| DT_MEMORY_ATTR_EXTMEM, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what is extmem suppose to mean? How does it differ from RAM?
|
Just adding the |
Keep the DNM, working on a better version of this. |
Bridge the usual disconnection between C code and DT / YAML file when using enums by introducing a new dt-bindings header file.