Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nrf_bsim - changes towards having nrf53_bsim - part 2 #62706

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2023

Conversation

aescolar
Copy link
Member

Two more minor changes in preparation for the upcoming nrf53_bsim boards:
(Sending them as their own PR to avoid a massive PR)


nrf5x_bsim: Add helper kconfig symbols for simulated nrf5340

Just like for the nrf52_bsim let's add helper kconfig symbols
which can be used to identify we are running in a target that
is compatible with the real HW but is not the real HW.


hal nordic: cmake: Add support for nrf53_bsim boards

Also set the HAL variant appropriately when building for
the new nrf53_bsim boards.

@aescolar aescolar changed the title nrf_bsim - changes towards having nrf53_bsim nrf_bsim - changes towards having nrf53_bsim - part 2 Sep 15, 2023
@aescolar aescolar marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2023 10:40
jori-nordic
jori-nordic previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2023
anangl
anangl previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2023
@aescolar aescolar added the DNM This PR should not be merged (Do Not Merge) label Sep 19, 2023
Just like for the nrf52_bsim let's add helper kconfig symbols
which can be used to identify we are running in a target that
is compatible with the real HW but is not the real HW.

Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alberto.escolar.piedras@nordicsemi.no>
Also set the HAL variant appropriately when building for
the new nrf53_bsim boards.

Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alberto.escolar.piedras@nordicsemi.no>
@aescolar aescolar removed the DNM This PR should not be merged (Do Not Merge) label Sep 19, 2023
@aescolar
Copy link
Member Author

Changed based on a suggestion from @anangl , as SOC_COMPATIBLE_NRF5340 was not really required.

@carlescufi carlescufi merged commit 6afe7cf into zephyrproject-rtos:main Sep 20, 2023
20 of 21 checks passed
@aescolar aescolar deleted the nrfbsim_minors2 branch September 20, 2023 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants