Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run regression-detector on main, but make it a no-op #31099

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

scottopell
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Github's branch protection seems to not include jobs that don't run on main.
SMP is making this job required soon (planned tomorrow) and this change should allow this job name to show up correctly in github and allow it to be a required check.

Motivation

SMP is making this job required soon (planned tomorrow) and this change should allow this job name to show up correctly in github and allow it to be a required check.

Describe how to test/QA your changes

n/a

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@scottopell scottopell added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Nov 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Nov 14, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Gitlab CI Configuration Changes

Modified Jobs

single-machine-performance-regression_detector
  single-machine-performance-regression_detector:
    allow_failure: false
    artifacts:
      expire_in: 1 weeks
      paths:
      - submission_metadata
      - ${CI_COMMIT_SHA}-baseline_sha
      - outputs/report.md
      - outputs/regression_signal.json
      - outputs/bounds_check_signal.json
      - outputs/junit.xml
      - outputs/report.json
      - outputs/decision_record.md
      when: always
    image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/docker_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
    needs:
    - artifacts: false
      job: single_machine_performance-amd64-a7
    rules:
-   - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
-     when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
      when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
      when: never
    - when: on_success
    script:
+   - $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main" && echo "No-op for main branch" && exit 0
    - mkdir outputs
    - git fetch origin
    - SMP_BASE_BRANCH=$(inv release.get-release-json-value base_branch)
    - echo "Looking for merge base for branch ${SMP_BASE_BRANCH}"
    - SMP_MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base ${CI_COMMIT_SHA} origin/${SMP_BASE_BRANCH})
    - echo "Merge base is ${SMP_MERGE_BASE}"
    - AWS_NAMED_PROFILE="single-machine-performance"
    - SMP_ACCOUNT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $SMP_ACCOUNT account_id)
      || exit $?
    - SMP_ECR_URL=${SMP_ACCOUNT_ID}.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com
    - SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $SMP_ACCOUNT agent_team_id)
      || exit $?
    - SMP_API=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $SMP_ACCOUNT api_url) || exit
      $?
    - SMP_BOT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $SMP_ACCOUNT bot_login)
      || exit $?
    - SMP_BOT_KEY=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $SMP_ACCOUNT bot_token)
      || exit $?
    - aws configure set aws_access_key_id "$SMP_BOT_ID" --profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE}
    - aws configure set aws_secret_access_key "$SMP_BOT_KEY" --profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE}
    - aws configure set region us-west-2 --profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE}
    - aws --profile single-machine-performance s3 cp s3://smp-cli-releases/v${SMP_VERSION}/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/smp
      smp
    - chmod +x smp
    - BASELINE_SHA="${SMP_MERGE_BASE}"
    - echo "Computing baseline..."
    - echo "Checking if commit ${BASELINE_SHA} is recent enough..."
    - FOUR_DAYS_BEFORE_NOW=$(date --date="-4 days +1 hour" "+%s")
    - BASELINE_COMMIT_TIME=$(git -c log.showSignature=false show --no-patch --format=%ct
      ${BASELINE_SHA})
    - "if [[ ${BASELINE_COMMIT_TIME} -le ${FOUR_DAYS_BEFORE_NOW} ]]\nthen\n    echo\
      \ \"ERROR: Merge-base of this branch is too old for SMP. Please update your branch\
      \ by merging an up-to-date main branch into your branch or by rebasing it on an\
      \ up-to-date main branch.\"\n    exit 1\nfi\n"
    - echo "Commit ${BASELINE_SHA} is recent enough"
    - echo "Checking if image exists for commit ${BASELINE_SHA}..."
    - "while [[ ! $(aws ecr describe-images --region us-west-2 --profile single-machine-performance\
      \ --registry-id \"${SMP_ACCOUNT_ID}\" --repository-name \"${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID}-agent\"\
      \ --image-ids imageTag=\"${BASELINE_SHA}-7-amd64\") ]]\ndo\n    echo \"No image\
      \ exists for ${BASELINE_SHA} - checking predecessor of ${BASELINE_SHA} next\"\n\
      \    BASELINE_SHA=$(git rev-parse ${BASELINE_SHA}^)\n    echo \"Checking if commit\
      \ ${BASELINE_SHA} is recent enough...\"\n    BASELINE_COMMIT_TIME=$(git -c log.showSignature=false\
      \ show --no-patch --format=%ct ${BASELINE_SHA})\n    if [[ ${BASELINE_COMMIT_TIME}\
      \ -le ${FOUR_DAYS_BEFORE_NOW} ]]\n    then\n        echo \"ERROR: Merge-base of\
      \ this branch is too old for SMP. Please update your branch by merging an up-to-date\
      \ main branch into your branch or by rebasing it on an up-to-date main branch.\"\
      \n        exit 1\n    fi\n    echo \"Commit ${BASELINE_SHA} is recent enough\"\
      \n    echo \"Checking if image exists for commit ${BASELINE_SHA}...\"\ndone\n"
    - echo "Image exists for commit ${BASELINE_SHA}"
    - echo "Baseline SHA is ${BASELINE_SHA}"
    - echo -n "${BASELINE_SHA}" > "${CI_COMMIT_SHA}-baseline_sha"
    - aws s3 cp --profile single-machine-performance --only-show-errors "${CI_COMMIT_SHA}-baseline_sha"
      "s3://${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID}-smp-artifacts/information/"
    - BASELINE_IMAGE=${SMP_ECR_URL}/${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID}-agent:${BASELINE_SHA}-7-amd64
    - echo "${BASELINE_SHA} | ${BASELINE_IMAGE}"
    - COMPARISON_IMAGE=${SMP_ECR_URL}/${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID}-agent:${CI_COMMIT_SHA}-7-amd64
    - echo "${CI_COMMIT_SHA} | ${COMPARISON_IMAGE}"
    - RUST_LOG="info,aws_config::profile::credentials=error"
    - RUST_LOG_DEBUG="debug,aws_config::profile::credentials=error"
    - RUST_LOG="${RUST_LOG}" ./smp --team-id ${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID} --api-base ${SMP_API}
      --aws-named-profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE} job submit --baseline-image ${BASELINE_IMAGE}
      --comparison-image ${COMPARISON_IMAGE} --baseline-sha ${BASELINE_SHA} --comparison-sha
      ${CI_COMMIT_SHA} --target-config-dir test/regression/ --submission-metadata submission_metadata
    - RUST_LOG="${RUST_LOG}" ./smp --team-id ${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID} --api-base ${SMP_API}
      --aws-named-profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE} job status --wait --wait-delay-seconds
      60 --submission-metadata submission_metadata
    - RUST_LOG="${RUST_LOG}" ./smp --team-id ${SMP_AGENT_TEAM_ID} --api-base ${SMP_API}
      --aws-named-profile ${AWS_NAMED_PROFILE} job sync --submission-metadata submission_metadata
      --output-path outputs
    - cat outputs/report.md | sed "s/^\$/$(echo -ne '\uFEFF\u00A0\u200B')/g"
    - DATADOG_API_KEY="$("$CI_PROJECT_DIR"/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh "$AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2"
      token)" || exit $?; export DATADOG_API_KEY
    - datadog-ci junit upload --service datadog-agent outputs/junit.xml
    - "python3 <<'EOF'\nimport json\nimport sys\n\ntry:\n    with open('outputs/report.json')\
      \ as f:\n        data = json.load(f)\nexcept FileNotFoundError:\n    print(\"\
      Machine readable report not found.\")\n    sys.exit(1)\nexcept json.JSONDecodeError\
      \ as e:\n    print(f\"Error parsing JSON report: {e}\")\n    sys.exit(1)\n\nexperiments\
      \ = data.get('experiments', {})\nfailed = False\ndecision_record = []\n\nfor exp_name,\
      \ exp_data in experiments.items():\n    if exp_name.startswith('quality_gate_'):\n\
      \        bounds_checks = exp_data.get('bounds_checks', {})\n        for check_name,\
      \ check_data in bounds_checks.items():\n            results = check_data.get('results',\
      \ {})\n            comparison = results.get('comparison', [])\n            num_total\
      \ = len(comparison)\n            failed_replicates = [\n                replicate\
      \ for replicate in comparison if not replicate.get('passed', False)\n        \
      \    ]\n            num_failed = len(failed_replicates)\n            num_passed\
      \ = num_total - num_failed\n            if failed_replicates:\n              \
      \  decision_record.append(\n                    f\"- **{exp_name}**, bounds check\
      \ **{check_name}**: {num_passed}/{num_total} replicas passed. Failed {num_failed}\
      \ which is > 0. Gate **FAILED**.\"\n                )\n                failed\
      \ = True\n            else:\n                decision_record.append(\n       \
      \             f\"- **{exp_name}**, bounds check **{check_name}**: {num_passed}/{num_total}\
      \ replicas passed. Gate passed.\"\n                )\n\nwith open('outputs/decision_record.md',\
      \ 'w') as f:\n    # Extra newline since this is appended to another report\n \
      \   f.write('\\n\\n## CI Pass/Fail Decision\\n\\n')\n    if failed:\n        f.write('\u274C\
      \ **Failed.** Some Quality Gates were violated.\\n\\n')\n        f.write('\\n'.join(decision_record))\n\
      \    else:\n        f.write('\u2705 **Passed.** All Quality Gates passed.\\n\\\
      n')\n        f.write('\\n'.join(decision_record))\n\nif failed:\n    print(\"\
      Quality gate failed, see decision record\")\n    sys.exit(1)\nelse:\n    print(\"\
      Quality gate passed.\")\n    sys.exit(0)\nEOF\n"
    stage: functional_test
    tags:
    - arch:amd64
    timeout: 1h10m
    variables:
      SMP_VERSION: 0.18.2
single-machine-performance-regression_detector-pr-comment
  single-machine-performance-regression_detector-pr-comment:
    allow_failure: true
    artifacts:
      expire_in: 1 weeks
      paths:
      - report_as_json_string.txt
      - pr_comment_payload.json
    image:
      entrypoint:
      - ''
      name: 486234852809.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/pr-commenter:3
    needs:
    - job: single-machine-performance-regression_detector
    rules:
-   - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
-     when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
      when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
      when: never
    - when: always
    script:
    - "if [[ ! -s \"outputs/report.md\" ]]\nthen\n    echo \"ERROR: Regression Detector\
      \ report not found -- no PR comment posted\"\n    exit 1\nfi\n"
    - cat outputs/report.md outputs/decision_record.md | sed -z 's/\n/\\n/g' | sed -z
      's/"/\\"/g' > report_as_json_string.txt
    - cat report_as_json_string.txt
    - PR_COMMENT_JSON_PAYLOAD='{"org":"DataDog", "repo":"datadog-agent", "commit":"'"${CI_COMMIT_SHA}"'",
      "header":"Regression Detector", "message":"'"$(cat report_as_json_string.txt)"'"}'
    - printf "%s\n" "PR comment JSON payload:${PR_COMMENT_JSON_PAYLOAD}"
    - printf "%s\n" "${PR_COMMENT_JSON_PAYLOAD}" > pr_comment_payload.json
    - "set +e\nout=$(curl https://pr-commenter.us1.ddbuild.io/internal/cit/pr-comment\
      \ \\\n    -H \"$(authanywhere)\" \\\n    -H \"X-DdOrigin: curl\" \\\n    -X PATCH\
      \ \\\n    -d \"${PR_COMMENT_JSON_PAYLOAD}\")\nexitcode=$?\nset -e\nif [ -n \"\
      ${out}\" ]; then\n  if [ $exitcode -eq 0 ]; then\n    echo $out\n  else\n    echo\
      \ $out >&2\n  fi\nfi\nif [ \"${out}\" != \"${out/invalid request: no pr found\
      \ for this commit}\" ]; then\n  exit 0\nfi\nexit $exitcode\n"
    stage: functional_test
    tags:
    - arch:amd64
    variables:
      FF_KUBERNETES_HONOR_ENTRYPOINT: false

Added Jobs

.except_release_branch
.except_release_branch:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
  when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
  when: never

Changes Summary

Removed Modified Added Renamed
0 2 1 0

ℹ️ Diff available in the job log.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 14, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 49076582 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 75d972a9-9ad6-48ec-a4bb-5c293f1fcd46

Baseline: 37e69fb
Comparison: 2cd01df
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +0.87 [-2.62, +4.35] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.85 [+0.23, +1.48] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.43 [+0.37, +0.50] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.34 [+0.22, +0.46] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.12 [-0.12, +0.37] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.15, +0.23] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.50, +0.51] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.09, +0.09] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.32, +0.32] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.05 [-0.09, -0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.30 [-0.78, +0.19] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.35 [-0.84, +0.14] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.43 [-1.15, +0.30] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -1.42 [-5.23, +2.39] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -2.48 [-2.62, -2.34] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 2/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 9/10 bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 2/10 replicas passed. Failed 8 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.

@scottopell scottopell marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 20:19
@scottopell scottopell requested review from a team as code owners November 14, 2024 20:19
.gitlab-ci.yml Outdated
SSH_PUBLIC_KEY_RSA: ci.datadog-agent.ssh_public_key_rsa # agent-devx-loops
VCPKG_BLOB_SAS_URL: ci.datadog-agent-buildimages.vcpkg_blob_sas_url # windows-agent
WINGET_PAT: ci.datadog-agent.winget_pat # windows-agent
AGENT_QA_PROFILE: ci.datadog-agent.agent-qa-profile # agent-devx-infra
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit, prefer not having formatting changes in the same commit

@scottopell
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-11-14 21:16:04 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2024-11-14 21:16:06 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2024-11-15 01:16:02 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

This merge request was unqueued

@scottopell scottopell closed this Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants