Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add signSchnorr to keychain api #171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fboucquez
Copy link
Contributor

@fboucquez fboucquez commented Nov 13, 2024

It fixes the keychain's api adding secp256k1.signSchnorr. If not, signing btc taproot fails with an undefiend error. Thread

Copy link
Contributor

@feri42 feri42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@fboucquez fboucquez enabled auto-merge (squash) November 13, 2024 14:22
Copy link
Contributor

@diegomura diegomura left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@fboucquez fboucquez merged commit 2da2b05 into master Nov 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@fboucquez fboucquez deleted the fboucquez/fix/keychain-api branch November 13, 2024 17:09
fboucquez added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ const createKeychainApi = ({ keychain }) => {
},
secp256k1: {
signBuffer: keychain.secp256k1.signBuffer,
signSchnorr: keychain.secp256k1.signSchnorr,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should have a type added to index.d.ts as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adding them now

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, forgot to mention I added in #174.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants