Enable pool fees when rebalancing Aerodrome AMO

[sparrowDom]

• Leave fees on Aerodrome pool when performing rebalances
• fix Quoter contract to report correct swap values when estimating amount to swap when reaching price. Before it was overshooting
• fix Quoter contract to start the binary search at a more appropriate levels according to the strategy contract's current TVL

Code Change Checklist

To be completed before internal review begins:

• The contract code is complete
• Executable deployment file
• Fork tests that test after the deployment file runs
• Unit tests *if needed
• The owner has done a full checklist review of the code + tests

Internal review:

• Two approvals by internal reviewers

Deploy checklist

Two reviewers complete the following checklist:

- [ ] All deployed contracts are listed in the deploy PR's description
- [ ] Deployed contract's verified code (and all dependencies) match the code in master
- [ ] Contract constructors have correct arguments
- [ ] The transactions that interacted with the newly deployed contract match the deploy script.
- [ ] Governance proposal matches the deploy script
- [ ] Smoke tests pass after fork test execution of the governance proposal

[github-actions]

	Warnings
⚠️	👀 This PR needs at least 2 reviewers

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against cf8084c

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.16%. Comparing base (704bc66) to head (cf8084c).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...acts/strategies/aerodrome/AerodromeAMOStrategy.sol	0.00%	20 Missing ⚠️
contracts/contracts/utils/AerodromeAMOQuoter.sol	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2276      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.26%   53.16%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        4089     4097       +8     
  Branches     1074     1074              
==========================================
  Hits         2178     2178              
- Misses       1908     1916       +8     
  Partials        3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sparrowDom]

@DanielVF & @shahthepro would you mind doing another pass? Aside from burning the OETHb left on the contract the main changes were a couple of fixes on the quoter contract (as described in PR description)

[shahthepro]

_checkForExpectedPoolPrice should be view not internal I believe (though it's not part of this PR)

[shahthepro]

nit: Can probably replace lines 431 to 439 with something like this. But not a big deal though since _removeLiquidityToEnsureSwap has a amountToSwap > 0 check

        if (_amountToSwap > 0) {
            if (tokenId != 0) {
                _removeLiquidityToEnsureSwap(_amountToSwap, _swapWeth);
            }

            _swapToDesiredPosition(_amountToSwap, _swapWeth, _minTokenReceived);
        }
        ```

[DanielVF]

Yes. I think this would be cleaner.

[DanielVF]

Do we want to do this > 1e12 thing inside _burnOethbOnTheContract() as well?

[sparrowDom]

agreed it makes sense as a defensive measure: cf8084c

[DanielVF]

Approved, though we might want to return early in the burn function if we just have dust. This way we'll only do non-dust burns.