-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ros2 control support package added #12
base: rolling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… simulators to work (#13) Co-authored-by: Dr. Denis <denis@stoglrobotics.de>
Co-authored-by: Dr. Denis <denis@stoglrobotics.de>
Co-authored-by: muritane <31107191+muritane@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good!
@muritane you created a script for testing this, didn't you? Can we attach this? |
use_mock_hardware:=^|false | ||
sim_gazebo_classic:=^|false | ||
sim_gazebo:=^|false | ||
simulation_controllers | ||
robot_description_package" | ||
> | ||
|
||
<xacro:property name="initial_positions" value="${load_yaml(initial_positions_file)['initial_positions']}"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should also utilize this agument lower under initial_value
tag
ros2 launch kuka_ros2_control_support test_ros2_control_kuka.launch.py robot_description_package:=kuka_kr16_support robot_description_macro_file:=kr16_2_macro.xacro robot_name:=kuka_kr16_2 controllers_file:=kuka_6dof_controllers.yaml | ||
|
||
``` | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kuka_rsi_hw_interface/CMakeLists.txt
Outdated
@@ -1,66 +1,83 @@ | |||
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1.0) | |||
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) | |
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.16) |
Co-authored-by: gwalck <guillaume.walck@stoglrobotics.de>
Due to many robots with tip at various poses, the test verifies only if the tool0 frame can be resolved and is non-null
With the listener within the main class, strange wait_for_message issues arise
No description provided.