Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

F1 Visa Experiences #577

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 28 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
244,895 changes: 244,895 additions & 0 deletions F1 Visa Experiences/Dataset/telegram.csv

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Binary file added F1 Visa Experiences/Images/final_accuracy.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added F1 Visa Experiences/Images/output.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added F1 Visa Experiences/Images/output_model2.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added F1 Visa Experiences/Images/output_model3.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
72 changes: 72 additions & 0 deletions F1 Visa Experiences/Model/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@



**F1 Visa Experiences**



**GOAL**


Finding out if the review is positive, negative or neutral.


**DATASET**



https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/adiamaan/f1-visa-experiences





**WORK DONE**

* Analyzed the data and found insights and plotted graphs accordingly etc.
* Preprocessed the data to make it fit for training for ML models.
* Next trained model with algorithms with default parameters:
* Logistic Regression
* Linear SVM
* Random Forest

* In this, Support Vector Machine(SVM) performed the best with 97.27% accuracy. (Refer : `visa_experience.ipynb`)


**MODELS USED**

1. Logistic Regression : Logistic regression is easier to implement, interpret, and very efficient to train. It is **very fast at classifying unknown records**.
2. Linear SVM : SVM performs well on classification problems when size of dataset is not too large.
3. Random Forest : It **provides higher accuracy through cross validation**. Random forest classifier will handle the missing values and maintain the accuracy of a large proportion of data. If there are more trees, it won't allow over-fitting trees in the model.

**LIBRARIES NEEDED**

* Numpy
* Pandas
* Matplotlib
* scikit-learn
* nltk



**PLOTS**

![Model Accuracies](../Images/final_accuracy.png "Model Accuracies")


**CONCLUSION**



We analyse the data, preprocess and visualize the features. We then investigated two predictive models. The data was split into two parts, a train set and a test set.

We started with Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier and SVM and SVM had the highest accuracy followed by Random Forest Classifier.



**CONTRIBUTION BY**

*Churnika S Mundas*


[![LinkedIn](https://img.shields.io/badge/linkedin-%230077B5.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=linkedin&logoColor=white)](https://www.linkedin.com/in/churnika-mundas-64767b246/) [![GitHub](https://img.shields.io/badge/github-%23121011.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=github&logoColor=white)](https://github.com/stackaway)
Loading
Loading