[API] Changed get_beta_softlabels interface to match the others
#60
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
victormvy
changed the title
get_beta_softlabels interface to match the othersget_beta_softlabels interface to match the others
franberchez
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changed
get_beta_softlabelsinterface to match the other soft labelling functions. More precisely, previously,get_beta_softlabelsreturned a vector ofJelements (the soft label associated with thep,qandaparameters received). Now, it only receivesJandparams_setas parameters and returns all the soft labels for a problem withJclasses (J x J matrix).Suggested in #40.