Better error message when trying to select a disabled model

[SamuelBFavarin]

resolves #9747

Problem

When you run a disabled model you get this error message, that it's not so clear.

21:53:02  The selection criterion 'log__user_table' does not match any nodes

Solution

After @graciegoheen, @dataders and @dbeatty10 discussion, they agreed with this log output:

21:53:02  The selection criterion 'log__user_table' does not match any enabled nodes

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions

[github-actions]

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.09%. Comparing base (a994ace) to head (45324e4).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9863      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.12%   88.09%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         178      178              
  Lines       22459    22457       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        19793    19783      -10     
- Misses       2666     2674       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	85.45% <100.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
unit	61.90% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[emmyoop]

@SamuelBFavarin thanks so much for making this message more clear for everyone! Really appreciate it. There's just one issue with the changelog yaml file. Once you fix that we should be able to get this change merged in!

[emmyoop]

Looks great! Thanks so much for the quality of life improvement @SamuelBFavarin!