-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Update Conversation List when new conversation is streamed #1333
Conversation
Add new conversation to list when streamed Fix content type errors
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications across several files, primarily enhancing error handling and control flow in functions related to conversation data management. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Performance Comparison ReportSignificant Changes To DurationThere are no entries Meaningless Changes To DurationShow entries
Show details
Render Count ChangesThere are no entries Render IssuesThere are no entries Added ScenariosThere are no entries Removed ScenariosThere are no entries |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
features/conversation-requests-list/useV3RequestItems.tsx (1)
51-61
: Consider caching spam scores for performanceSince spam score calculation is an expensive operation that could be called frequently, consider caching the results.
Example implementation:
+ const spamScoreCache = new Map<string, number>(); + let spamScore = 0; try { if (contentType) { + const cacheKey = `${content}-${contentType}`; + if (spamScoreCache.has(cacheKey)) { + spamScore = spamScoreCache.get(cacheKey)!; + } else { spamScore = await getV3SpamScore({ message: content, contentType, }); + spamScoreCache.set(cacheKey, spamScore); + } } } catch (error) { logger.error("Couldn't get spam score", error); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
features/conversation-requests-list/useV3RequestItems.tsx
(2 hunks)queries/useV3ConversationListQuery.ts
(1 hunks)utils/xmtpRN/contentTypes/index.ts
(1 hunks)utils/xmtpRN/conversations.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
queries/useV3ConversationListQuery.ts (1)
Learnt from: alexrisch
PR: ephemeraHQ/converse-app#1313
File: queries/useV3ConversationListQuery.ts:196-268
Timestamp: 2024-12-05T18:33:24.472Z
Learning: In the TypeScript file `queries/useV3ConversationListQuery.ts`, helper functions like `updateGroupImageToConversationListQuery`, `updateGroupNameToConversationListQuery`, and `updateGroupDescriptionToConversationListQuery` are used to reduce dependency on exact types or creating objects that get passed unnecessarily, even though they internally use `updateGroupMetadataToConversationListQuery`.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
utils/xmtpRN/contentTypes/index.ts (1)
29-32
: LGTM! Robust null check added to getMessageContentType
The addition of undefined handling improves the function's robustness and helps prevent runtime errors when processing messages without content types.
Let's verify all callers handle the undefined return value appropriately:
✅ Verification successful
Undefined return value is handled appropriately in all callers
All usages of getMessageContentType
have been verified and are safe:
- In
notificationContent.ts
: Safely checks truthiness with!!
and has early return - In
useV3RequestItems.tsx
: Explicitly checksif (contentType)
before using - In
message-utils.tsx
: All comparisons with string literals (=== "text"
etc.) are safe with undefined - In
useMessageText.ts
: Safe comparison with string literal
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of getMessageContentType
ast-grep --pattern 'getMessageContentType($_)' -A 3
Length of output: 4425
features/conversation-requests-list/useV3RequestItems.tsx (1)
1-1
: LGTM! Improved error handling in spam score calculation
Good improvements:
- Safe initialization of spamScore
- Proper error handling with logging
- Defensive check for contentType existence
Also applies to: 51-61
queries/useV3ConversationListQuery.ts (1)
170-170
: LGTM! Added null check for conversation data
Good defensive programming practice to check for existence of previous conversations data.
utils/xmtpRN/conversations.ts (3)
17-17
: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the new conversation list update functionality
The import is correctly placed and follows the project's import conventions.
25-25
: Consider consistent conversation list updates across the codebase
Other conversation creation/management functions might need similar updates to maintain consistency with the new query-based approach. For example, createConversationByAccount
has commented-out code that used the old handleNewConversation
approach.
25-25
: Verify query performance in streaming scenarios
The new query-based update mechanism needs verification for performance in high-frequency streaming scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the query implementation and caching mechanism.
Let me check one more aspect regarding the query client implementation and any potential optimizations.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the query performance in streaming scenarios.
Performance optimizations are already in place for streaming scenarios
The implementation includes several performance safeguards:
- Uses TanStack Query's built-in caching and state management
- Implements structural sharing optimization (disabled to prevent unnecessary rerenders)
- Has configurable stale time and garbage collection settings
- Employs query-based persister instead of whole state persistence
- Handles streaming cancellation properly through
cancelStream()
mechanism
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential performance bottlenecks in the conversation list query implementation
# Look for debouncing or throttling mechanisms in the query implementation
rg -A 10 "addConversationToConversationListQuery" --type ts
# Check for batch update patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'function addConversationToConversationListQuery($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3996
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of conversation list query data management
rg -A 15 "setConversationListQueryData|getConversationListQueryData" --type ts
# Look for any caching or state management patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ConversationListQuery = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6318
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check query client configuration and optimization settings
rg -A 10 "queryClient" --type ts
# Look for any debouncing or batching mechanisms
rg -A 10 "useQuery.*conversation" --type ts
Length of output: 47571
|
||
if (!previousConversationsData) return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider initializing empty conversation list instead of early return
The early return when no previous conversations exist could lead to missed updates. Consider initializing with an empty array instead.
- if (!previousConversationsData) return;
+ if (!previousConversationsData) {
+ setConversationListQueryData(account, [conversation]);
+ return;
+ }
This ensures that updates are not lost when the conversation list is initially empty.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (!previousConversationsData) return; | |
if (!previousConversationsData) { | |
setConversationListQueryData(account, [conversation]); | |
return; | |
} |
|
||
addConversationToConversationListQuery(account, conversation); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for the query update
The conversation list update should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential failures gracefully. Also, consider removing the empty line for better readability.
logger.info("[XMTPRN Conversations] GOT A NEW CONVO");
-
- addConversationToConversationListQuery(account, conversation);
+ try {
+ await addConversationToConversationListQuery(account, conversation);
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.error("[XMTPRN Conversations] Failed to update conversation list", error);
+ }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
addConversationToConversationListQuery(account, conversation); | |
logger.info("[XMTPRN Conversations] GOT A NEW CONVO"); | |
try { | |
await addConversationToConversationListQuery(account, conversation); | |
} catch (error) { | |
logger.error("[XMTPRN Conversations] Failed to update conversation list", error); | |
} |
if (!contentType) { | ||
return undefined; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should put | undefined here 🤔
And instead handle the undefined before calling the function.
Curious on your thoughts. It's just that I feel it's counterintuitive to call this function with a contentType that is undefined haha.
Love the | undefined
instead of ?: string
tho! At least it shows it wants an argument
Add new conversation to list when streamed Fix content type errors
Add new conversation to list when streamed
Fix content type errors
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation