Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

round factor tests #7515

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

round factor tests #7515

Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
5488027
composite format tests
naronchen Dec 27, 2024
b14c64a
more test cases
naronchen Dec 27, 2024
0c17985
Merge branch 'master' into naron/roundFactorTests
naronchen Jan 9, 2025
5a758e0
Merge branch 'master' into naron/roundFactorTests
hl662 Jan 9, 2025
b5c4900
Merge branch 'master' into naron/roundFactorTests
naronchen Jan 10, 2025
be57da0
reset to default precision
naronchen Jan 10, 2025
85daa02
rush change
naronchen Jan 10, 2025
deef667
Merge branch 'master' into naron/roundFactorTests
rschili Jan 14, 2025
ca6c5cb
Merge branch 'master' into naron/roundFactorTests
naronchen Jan 14, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
71 changes: 70 additions & 1 deletion core/quantity/src/test/CompositeFormats.test.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { FormatterSpec } from "../Formatter/FormatterSpec";
import { Formatter } from "../Formatter/Formatter";
import { BasicUnit } from "../Unit";
import { TestUnitsProvider } from "./TestUtils/TestHelper";
import { FormatTraits } from "../core-quantity";
import { DecimalPrecision, FormatTraits } from "../core-quantity";

describe("Composite Formats tests:", () => {
it("Bad Composite unit order", async () => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -727,4 +727,73 @@ describe("Composite Formats tests:", () => {
await format.fromJSON(unitsProvider, compositeFormat).catch(() => { });
expect(JSON.stringify(format.toJSON().composite)).to.eql(`{"spacer":"","includeZero":true,"units":[{"name":"Units.KM"},{"name":"Units.M","label":""},{"name":"Units.CM","label":"CM"},{"name":"Units.MM","label":"'"}]}`);
});

it("Test roundFactor with Composite Format", async () => {
const unitsProvider = new TestUnitsProvider();

const formatData = {
composite: {
includeZero: true,
spacer: "",
units: [
{
label: "",
name: "Units.M",
},
],
},
formatTraits: ["applyRounding"],
type: "Decimal",
uomSeparator: "",
};

const format = new Format("test");
await format.fromJSON(unitsProvider, formatData).catch(() => { });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why catch here? Test should fail, so if the exception is thrown that should be fine?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm good point. This is how format is set up in all other tests as well. I guess it means we wanna proceed with whatever information was successfully loaded into the format (even in the future they change impl of loading format), rather than failing immediately due to an exception. So allow testing with partial info? it is a bit weird.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hm can you quickly verify that's the case? If it is, that seems like a wonky test, relying on things that are not allowed out there in the wild to compose the test inputs...
If there is no error thrown, please remove the portion

assert.isTrue(format.hasUnits);

const testQuantityData = [
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0, result: "1" },
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.5, result: "1" },
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.1, result: "1" },
{ magnitude: 1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.1, result: "1.2" },
{ magnitude: 1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.05, precision: 1, result: "1.3" }, // apply rounding but precision is higher

{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.6, result: "1.2" },
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.3, result: "0.9" },


{ magnitude: 987.65, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 100, result: "1000" },
{ magnitude: 987.65, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 1000, result: "1000" },
{ magnitude: 987.65, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 2000, result: "0" },

// negative value
{ magnitude: -1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.1, result: "-1.2" },
{ magnitude: -1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: -0.5, result: "-1" },
{ magnitude: -1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.5, result: "-1" },
{ magnitude: 1.23, unit: { name: "Units.M", label: "m", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: -0.5, result: "1" }, // TODO: should this one give an error?

// with unit conversion
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.IN", label: "in", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, result: "0.0254" }, // round factor defaults to 0
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.IN", label: "in", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.5, result: "0" },
{ magnitude: 1, unit: { name: "Units.IN", label: "in", contextId: "Units.LENGTH" }, roundFactor: 0.01, result: "0.03" },
];

for (const testEntry of testQuantityData) {
const unit = new BasicUnit(testEntry.unit.name, testEntry.unit.label, testEntry.unit.contextId);
if (testEntry.roundFactor)
format.roundFactor = testEntry.roundFactor;
if (testEntry.precision)
format.precision = testEntry.precision;
const spec = await FormatterSpec.create("test", format, unitsProvider, unit);
const formattedValue = Formatter.formatQuantity(testEntry.magnitude, spec);

assert.isTrue(formattedValue.length > 0);
assert.strictEqual(formattedValue, testEntry.result);

// reset format
format.roundFactor = 0;
format.precision = 12 as DecimalPrecision;
hl662 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
}
})

});
Loading