Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pt] Improved even more the verbs/nouns rule in disambiguation.xml, rule ID:RARE_POS #11004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Nov 9, 2024

In the previous commit I tried to restrict the rule, but I was wrong, ChatGPT said that the results were all valid, so there is no reason to restrict it.

_1_the_full_one.txt

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced disambiguation rules for Portuguese grammar, improving accuracy in handling parts of speech.
    • Added rules for common laughter onomatopoeia and their classifications.
    • Introduced new rules for better processing of numerical expressions, percentages, and time formats.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated rules that conflicted with common language usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces extensive modifications to the disambiguation.xml file for Portuguese language rules in LanguageTool. Key updates include the addition, removal, and modification of rules and patterns aimed at improving the disambiguation of parts of speech, particularly for conjunctions, adverbs, and verbs. New rules have been implemented for handling laughter onomatopoeia and numerical expressions, while outdated rules have been removed. The overall changes enhance the accuracy of language processing capabilities for Portuguese.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml Extensive modifications including the addition of new rules for laughter onomatopoeia, updates to numerical expression handling, and removal of outdated rules.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jaumeortola
  • p-goulart
  • susanaboatto

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1)

Line range hint 233-238: LGTM! Consider adding more documentation about the pattern.

The disambiguation rule correctly identifies and handles verb/noun ambiguity by looking at surrounding context. The pattern effectively matches sequences where a word could be either a verb or noun and uses the context to disambiguate.

While the code works well, it would be helpful to add more detailed documentation about:

  • What specific cases this pattern catches
  • Examples of the ambiguities it resolves
  • Why removing the verb reading is the correct action in these cases
  <rule> <!-- Used ChatGPT 4o to verify the results -->
+  <!-- This rule disambiguates words that could be either verbs or nouns by looking at surrounding context.
+       Example: In "o carpinteiro serra madeira", "carpinteiro" is disambiguated as a noun because:
+       - It follows an article
+       - It's followed by another noun
+       The verb reading is removed in such cases as the context clearly indicates nominal usage.
+  -->
    <pattern>
      <token postag='VMP00.+' postag_regexp="yes"/>
      <token min='0' max='1' postag='RM' postag_regexp="no"/>
      <marker>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3bcbbd and 36f9e83.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant