fix: Add privacy manifest #334
Conversation
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [9.4.0](9.3.0...9.4.0) (2024-02-21) ### Features * Add new identify method with time out support ([#344](#344)) ([34ba8ab](34ba8ab)) * Implement shedding identity queue ([#343](#343)) ([393a28c](393a28c)) * Introduce variation method with generic return types ([#342](#342)) ([7ff2ffb](7ff2ffb)) ### Bug Fixes * Add privacy manifest ([#334](#334)) ([154fde7](154fde7)) * Ensure anonymous context is valid ([#338](#338)) ([65406cc](65406cc)) * Replace simple logger with os_log statements ([#340](#340)) ([7ba4397](7ba4397)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: LaunchDarklyReleaseBot <LaunchDarklyReleaseBot@launchdarkly.com>
|
Is there a way to stop the tracking of users? Because tracking is a big deal in the Apple world, if the LD sdk tracks, when we have to request user's permission, and if the user says no, we gotta stop tracking. Is there a way to do that without crippling the LD integration? @keelerm84 |
My apologies for the delay in getting back to your question! It is my understanding that the type of data our SDK uses does not require user interaction for approval. We are not tracking users for advertisement purposes; rather, any identifier is consumer provided and sent to our servers for the purpose of flag evaluation and experimentation. |
|
@keelerm84 If that is truly the case, then the following values should be
Otherwise, you are basically declaring to Apple that the LaunchDarkly Framework is tracking for the purpose of App Tracking Transparency. |
|
@choulepoka Yes, you are correct. We had the type tracking field set incorrectly. This is being adjusted in #366 and should be out in the next patch release (9.6.2). |
No description provided.