Feeding #1316
Feeding #1316
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 However, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the code functions correctly:
-
Constructor Initialization: The
CatandDogclasses are missing theappetiteargument in theirsuper().__init__calls. TheCatclass should pass an appetite of 3, and theDogclass should pass an appetite of 7. This is essential for the proper functioning of theAnimalclass constructor. -
Return Value in
print_nameMethod: Theprint_namemethod should return a string instead of printing it. This change is necessary to meet the expected functionality.
Please make these changes to align with the core requirements of the task. Once updated, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Cat(Animal): | ||
| def __init__(self, name: str, is_hungry: bool = True) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The super().__init__ call is missing the appetite argument required by the Animal class constructor. You should pass the default appetite value for a Cat (3) to the super().__init__ call.
app/main.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Dog(Animal): | ||
| def __init__(self, name: str, is_hungry: bool = True) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The super().__init__ call is missing the appetite argument required by the Animal class constructor. You should pass the default appetite value for a Dog (7) to the super().__init__ call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on addressing the previous issues in your code! 🎉 Here are a few points to consider for further improvement:
-
Incorrect Argument in Cat Initialization: Ensure that the
Catinstance is initialized with an integer forappetiteinstead of a boolean. This is crucial for the code to function correctly. -
Redundant Attribute Initialization: In both
CatandDogclasses, theappetiteandis_hungryattributes are being set twice. Since they are already initialized in thesuper().__init__call, you can remove the redundant initialization.
Overall, your code is in good shape and meets the task requirements. Keep up the good work and make sure to address these points in future iterations to enhance your coding skills. Remember, learning from these experiences will help you grow as a developer. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| class Cat(Animal): | ||
| def __init__(self, name: str, appetite: int = 3, is_hungry: bool = True) -> None: | ||
| super().__init__(name, appetite, is_hungry) | ||
| self.appetite = appetite |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The appetite and is_hungry attributes are already initialized in the super().__init__ call. You don't need to set them again in the Cat class constructor.
| def __init__(self, name: str, appetite: int = 7, is_hungry: bool = True) -> None: | ||
| super().__init__(name, appetite, is_hungry) | ||
| self.appetite = appetite | ||
| self.is_hungry = is_hungry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The appetite and is_hungry attributes are already initialized in the super().__init__ call. You don't need to set them again in the Dog class constructor.
| feed_num.append(animal.feed()) | ||
| return sum(feed_num) | ||
|
|
||
| cat = Cat("Cat", False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Cat instance is being initialized with a boolean value False instead of an integer for appetite. This should be an integer value, such as 3.
No description provided.