chore: separate schemas from conditions to allow better combinations/reuse of schemas

[derekpierre]

Type of PR:

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Documentation
• Other

Required reviews:

• 1
• 2
• 3

What this does:
Currently, condition schemas and condition objects are mixed in the same module. This can generate a circular dependency when trying to reuse schemas for other condition schemas.

Instead, we should separate schemas from conditions so that the schemas can be obtained from a standalone module, increasing their use with other condition schemas.

This change allows us to have a anyConditionSchema that includes all condition schemas where any condition can be re-used eg. in CompoundCondition and SequentialCondition whose schemas can be recursive.

Overall, this PR is simply reshuffling code around and ensuring that the same exports from before are still available.

NOTE that the schemas folder is not publicly exported as part of @nucypher/taco library directly. Instead, schemas are still exported from their original condition module to maintain compatibility.

Issues fixed/closed:

• Fixes #...

Why it's needed:

Explain how this PR fits in the greater context of the NuCypher Network. E.g.,
if this PR address a nucypher/productdev issue, let reviewers know!

Notes for reviewers:

What should reviewers focus on? Is there a particular commit/function/section
of your PR that requires more attention from reviewers?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.00214% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (epic-v0.6.x@2a51cac). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/taco/src/conditions/schemas/common.ts	90.76%	6 Missing ⚠️
packages/taco/src/conditions/schemas/compound.ts	91.66%	4 Missing ⚠️
packages/taco/src/conditions/schemas/contract.ts	95.87%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             epic-v0.6.x     #591   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   89.00%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?       71           
  Lines                  ?     6383           
  Branches               ?      165           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     5681           
  Misses                 ?      702           
  Partials               ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[manumonti]

LGTM!

Good TS work here, sir 🫡

[cygnusv]

What's the criteria for capitalizing some elements and others not?

[derekpierre]

I'm unsure if there were criteria, but there was a pre-existing format for earlier conditions where the schema definition was not capitalized, but other types were.