common: introduce fuses against ill-considered use of NDCTL_ENABLE=n (fix)

[janekmi]

Ref: #5946

Preview: https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/actions/runs/8359582617

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.12%. Comparing base (204bdff) to head (72f9cee).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6062      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.13%   70.12%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         133      133              
  Lines       19565    19565              
  Branches     3261     3261              
==========================================
- Hits        13721    13720       -1     
- Misses       5844     5845       +1     

[grom72]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

---

.github/actions/pmem_test_prepare/action.yml line 45 at r1 (raw file):

        NDCTL_ENABLE: ${{ inputs.ndctl_enable }}
        PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_DIRTY_SHUTDOWN: ${{ fromJSON(inputs._env_ignore_dict)[inputs.ndctl_enable] }}
        PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_BAD_BLOCKS: ${{ fromJSON(inputs._env_ignore_dict)[inputs.ndctl_enable] }}

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/expressions#example

Suggestion:

        PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_DIRTY_SHUTDOWN: ${{ inputs.ndctl_enable == 'y' && 'y' || 'n' }}
        PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_BAD_BLOCKS: ${{ inputs.ndctl_enable == 'y' && 'y' || 'n' }}

[grom72]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 1 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

[grom72]

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 1 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

[grom72]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

[grom72]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

a discussion (no related file):
It is here:
5f00672

---

[janekmi]

Included in #5950.