feat: migrate limit orders to utilize redux for state management

[woodenfurniture]

Description

Migrates the WIP limit orders feature to utilize redux for state management. As the inputs of spot and limit trades are basically identical and contain extremely high risk code, a higher-order slice pattern has been adopted to deduplicate the logic and minimise surface area.

Also includes 2 fixes suggested by @NeOMakinG in #8095:

• fix: free trades are free
• fix: reset market rate when switching assets

Issue (if applicable)

closes #8111

Risk

High Risk PRs Require 2 approvals

High risk. The migration to use of a new design pattern for trades means that although the core logic is left totally untouched, we should review and test this with extreme caution.

What protocols, transaction types, wallets or contract interactions might be affected by this PR?

All trades for all protocols, specifically trade input (including receive address, slippage, everything).

Testing

⚠️ For trades, no change from prod should be observed.

A complete regression test of trades should be completed, including various inputs, configs, swappers, multi-hop, custom recipient, different accounts, etc.

Engineering

Operations

• 🏁 My feature is behind a flag and doesn't require operations testing (yet)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Swap via THORChain to manual receive address

Swap via LiFi to custom account number (#1) and custom slippage (1.5%)

Swap via CoW with custom slippage (1.5%)

Swap via 0x

[NeOMakinG]

Pretty straighforward, there is no so much risks tbh it's basically taking the trade input slices and make it reusable so we don't duplicate things limit order logic (I'm not saying that it's not a big amount of work, nicely done @woodenfurniture 🐐 )

Small review, pending runtime testing that I'm going to do right now

[NeOMakinG]

✅ THORChain => ARB

https://jam.dev/c/794b1c7b-ae13-446c-829a-158f3316a8ce

✅ Li.Fi Multi hop

https://jam.dev/c/13233bb7-e02b-4457-8fd3-ab62cd6bd93d
⚠️ I had a problem with the second hop but I think it's unrelated, can you confirm @woodenfurniture ?

✅ 0x single hop

https://jam.dev/c/2535485d-f872-4f3d-9359-1c4a54caaefb

✅ Portals swap with custom slippage (1.5%)

https://jam.dev/c/224ad78d-84df-40fc-bc18-ba402023114b

✅ Custom receive address

https://jam.dev/c/4a4765ad-f4c2-4ba1-b0e1-92b33153082f

General smoke test

Small visual issue, the centered content is sticked to the top (not blocking)
Learn more text is bigger than regular text

https://jam.dev/c/96b774bb-f0b8-46b3-9007-8c591cc9cb3d

Looks good to me!

[gomesalexandre]

Big chunky boy but actually a pretty straightforward change conceptually, big 🐐 on the higher-order slice/selectors as a concept ser that's actually a perfect and does avoid an almost 1/1 slice/selectors duplication here!

Runtime pass to follow.

[gomesalexandre]

Swapper regression test LGTM!

https://gist.github.com/gomesalexandre/3b653d55e9e722484b25325a6a293d4c