Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCIP-4359 fee quoter supports interface for keystone #15448

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

0xsuryansh
Copy link
Member

Keystone Forwarder checks for the receiver to support IReceiver interface using ERC165 supportsInterface

This PR :

  • Enforced IReceiver implementations to implement supportsInterface

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Static analysis results are available

Hey @0xsuryansh, you can view Slither reports in the job summary here or download them as artifact here.
Please check them before merging and make sure you have addressed all issues.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2024

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

0xsuryansh and others added 5 commits November 28, 2024 18:55
…face_for_Keystone' into CCIP-4359_FeeQuoter_supportsInterface_for_Keystone
…_Keystone

# Conflicts:
#	contracts/gas-snapshots/ccip.gas-snapshot
#	core/gethwrappers/ccip/generation/generated-wrapper-dependency-versions-do-not-edit.txt
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Solidity Review Jira issue

Hey! We have taken the liberty to link this PR to a Jira issue for Solidity Review.

This is a new feature, that's currently in the pilot phase, so please make sure that the linkage is correct. In a contrary case, please update it manually in JIRA and replace Solidity Review issue key in the changeset file with the correct one.
Please reach out to the Test Tooling team and notify them about any issues you encounter.

Any changes to the Solidity Review Jira issue should be reflected in the changeset file. If you need to update the issue key, please do so manually in the following changeset file: contracts/.changeset/tender-lemons-punch.md

This PR has been linked to Solidity Review Jira issue: CCIP-3966

@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2024 13:36
@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh requested review from a team as code owners November 28, 2024 13:36
DeividasK
DeividasK previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@RensR RensR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add a test that actually uses the keystone contract to call into the feeQuoter

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ pragma solidity 0.8.24;

import {IReceiver} from "../keystone/interfaces/IReceiver.sol";
import {ITypeAndVersion} from "../shared/interfaces/ITypeAndVersion.sol";

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: remove newline

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh requested review from a team as code owners December 2, 2024 15:13
@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh requested review from RensR and DeividasK December 2, 2024 15:57
@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 4, 2024
@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit c1ee7ab Dec 4, 2024
202 of 203 checks passed
@0xsuryansh 0xsuryansh deleted the CIP-4359_FeeQuoter_supportsInterface_for_Keystone branch December 4, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants