Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:17159] [Mellanox] Implement low power mode for cmis host management #17693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

For cmis host management mode, the prevous sysfs cannot be used for low power mode setting. This PR reuses existing low power mode implementation in sonic_xcvr package when CMIS host management mode is enabled

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Use sonic_xcvr low power mode implementation when CMIS host management mode is enabled.

How to verify it

Manual test for CMIS host management mode
Regression test for old mode and backward compatible test

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…et#17159)

- Why I did it
For cmis host management mode, the prevous sysfs cannot be used for low power mode setting. This PR reuses existing low power mode implementation in sonic_xcvr package when CMIS host management mode is enabled

- How I did it
Use sonic_xcvr low power mode implementation when CMIS host management mode is enabled.

- How to verify it
Manual test for CMIS host management mode
Regression test for old mode and backward compatible test
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #17159

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit fb7bad2 into sonic-net:202311 Jan 5, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants