Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strict concurrency and project maintenance #132

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

NickEntin
Copy link
Collaborator

@NickEntin NickEntin commented Aug 28, 2024

  • Support strict concurrency
  • Update CI builds to run on macOS 14
  • Update snapshot tests to run on iOS 17 and iPadOS 17
  • Bump minimum deployment target to iOS 13

* Support strict conncurrency
* Update CI builds to run on macOS 14
* Update snapshot tests to run on iOS 17 and iPadOS 17
* Bump minimum deployment target to iOS 13
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ The extra space within a label above the "cap height" and below the "baseline" o

## Requirements

* iOS 12.0 or later
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apple no longer supports shipping to iOS 12, so there's no point in supporting it here

@NickEntin NickEntin requested a review from dfed August 29, 2024 00:10
@NickEntin NickEntin requested a review from pwesten August 29, 2024 00:45
strategy:
matrix:
platform: ['iOS_14', 'iOS_13']
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In practice I've never seen a difference across iOS versions with Paralayout's test suite, so not too concerned about having more limited iOS version coverage. I think the advantage of having 2x and 3x scales here outweighs the version matrix.

@@ -170,11 +170,13 @@ extension AlignmentContext {

// MARK: -

@MainActor
private let ParalayoutLog = OSLog(subsystem: "com.squareup.Paralayout", category: "layout")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

somewhat nuts that OSLog is not Sendable. Maybe that'll change in Xcode 16?

@NickEntin NickEntin merged commit f426143 into master Aug 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@NickEntin NickEntin deleted the nick/strict-concurrency branch August 29, 2024 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants