-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(blockifier): use sierra version in native blockifier #2809
base: aviv/refactor_blockifier_contract_class
Are you sure you want to change the base?
refactor(blockifier): use sierra version in native blockifier #2809
Conversation
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to add python PR
Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)
a discussion (no related file):
blocking, pending python PR
crates/blockifier/src/execution/contract_class.rs
line 311 at r1 (raw file):
pub fn try_from_json_string( (raw_contract_class, sierra_version): (&str, SierraVersion),
why tuple and not two params? non-blocking
Suggestion:
raw_contract_class: &str, sierra_version: SierraVersion
18c18b1
to
1c1fd9d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 1 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, dorimedini-starkware wrote…
blocking, pending python PR
crates/blockifier/src/execution/contract_class.rs
line 311 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, dorimedini-starkware wrote…
why tuple and not two params? non-blocking
Its a good question
lol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)
a040553
to
87285bf
Compare
1c1fd9d
to
09c392b
Compare
4022be4
to
0b19960
Compare
09c392b
to
2553415
Compare
0b19960
to
5d8e938
Compare
2553415
to
46b65f0
Compare
5d8e938
to
e6dbb02
Compare
46b65f0
to
facff36
Compare
3b35f20
to
f88449c
Compare
facff36
to
850718f
Compare
No description provided.