fix(mapping_based_calibrator): typo in the lidar-lidar calibrator

[knzo25]

Description

As pointed in #209, the checkKeyframeLost was wrongly computed due to a typo that ignored one of the conditions. This PR addresses that issue.

Related links

Issue: #209

Tests performed

None

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (bab5400) to head (2334c0e).
Report is 25 commits behind head on tier4/universe.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...apping_based_calibrator/src/calibration_mapper.cpp	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           tier4/universe    #211      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage            0.93%   0.00%   -0.94%     
=================================================
  Files                 270      28     -242     
  Lines               21339    2653   -18686     
  Branches              383     223     -160     
=================================================
- Hits                  200       0     -200     
+ Misses              20982    2653   -18329     
+ Partials              157       0     -157     

Flag	Coverage Δ
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vividf]

LGTM