-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dts: nxp: nxp_imx: rt500: update pinctrl files #439
dts: nxp: nxp_imx: rt500: update pinctrl files #439
Conversation
2471943
to
75335bf
Compare
Pinout need to be double check. So this PR need to wait the result of confirmation. |
@lucien-nxp We need a Zephyr side PR to ensure CI is okay |
75335bf
to
7932660
Compare
Added pinout have been confirmed. Please help review the PR. Thank you. |
What @dleach02 means by this is that we need a PR on the Zephyr side pulling this PR in (referencing it within the west.yml as |
Actually looking at this more, this is strictly additions- @dleach02 do you think we really need a full CI run for this change? |
I will wait for David's respond about CI test. If needed, I will create a pr in zephyr side. |
This is always needed. It's a Zephyr project policy, not an NXP policy. |
Yeah, the documented process does request a Zephyr PR always be created. @lucien-nxp can you please make one? |
7932660
to
98752f9
Compare
Re-generate pinctrl files for RT500 according to data patch Signed-off-by: Lucien Zhao <lucien.zhao@nxp.com>
98752f9
to
795774a
Compare
pinctrl file will be changed to a new model on RT 3 platforms, so there is no need to update on this PR. |
Re-generate pinctrl files for RT500 according to data patch