Blob tx and instructions #780
Conversation
| bldd: DependentCost::LightOperation { | ||
| base: 15, | ||
| units_per_gas: 272, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Needs a fuel-core benches run on reference hardware
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need to create an issue in the fuel-core
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| bldd: DependentCost::LightOperation { | ||
| base: 15, | ||
| units_per_gas: 272, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need to create an issue in the fuel-core
| @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ | |||
| use super::*; | |||
| /// File generated by fuel-core: benches/src/bin/collect.rs:440. With the following git | |||
| /// hash | |||
| pub const GIT: &str = "98341e564b75d1157e61d7d5f38612f6224a5b30"; | |||
| pub const GIT: &str = "98341e564b75d1157e61d7d5f38612f6224a5b30"; // TODO: modified manually | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don't need to do it for now. As we discussed during the call, we need to remove default gas costs from the fuel-vm. But it will be a separate PR for separate issue=) We could create a tech-debt for now in the fuel-vm to remove default costs in the future
| Revert, | ||
| Panic(PanicReason), | ||
| GenericFailure(u64), | ||
| pub struct AluOk { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to touch it in this PR?=)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The RunResult changes must be done here, and these are a natural consequence of those. It would be weird not to do them here.
Co-authored-by: Green Baneling <XgreenX9999@gmail.com>
| let old = storage | ||
| .storage_as_mut::<BlobData>() | ||
| .replace(blob_id, blob_data.as_ref()) | ||
| .map_err(RuntimeError::Storage)?; | ||
|
|
||
| if old.is_some() { | ||
| return Err(InterpreterError::Panic(PanicReason::BlobIdAlreadyUploaded)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe it will be cheaper to use contains + insert instead of replace. But it can be done in a separate PR/Issue, because other places have the same problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe? Also should be profiled if we're doing anything for performance reasons.
Work towards #589. The VM PR FuelLabs/fuel-vm#780 contains a working implementation. To allow contracts larger than the contract size limit, and to allow upgradability, we'll be adding a new tx type that's just a bunch of bytes, and opcodes to load subsections of that. A *blob* will be like a contract, but without state or balances, allowing it to be quite a bit cheaper. The new instructions `BSIZ` and `BLDD` and the new blob mode for `LDC` closely follow how `CSIZ`, `LDC` and `CCP` work, but only operation on blob data. ### Before requesting review - [x] I have reviewed the code myself
Work towards FuelLabs/fuel-specs#589. Spec PR: FuelLabs/fuel-specs#592. Core PR FuelLabs/fuel-core#1988.
Open for the first round of reviews, but:
Open questions include:
Checklist
Before requesting review
After merging, notify other teams