Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds ImageBinarization to Images.jl #1030

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023
Merged

Adds ImageBinarization to Images.jl #1030

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

ashwani-rathee
Copy link
Member

  • Adds ImageBinarization to Images.jl

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (b0592ea) 87.60% compared to head (23b321e) 87.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1030   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.60%   87.60%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         823      823           
=======================================
  Hits          721      721           
  Misses        102      102           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Images.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

johnnychen94
johnnychen94 previously approved these changes Jul 19, 2023
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ jobs:
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
julia-version: ['1.3', '1', 'nightly']
julia-version: ['1.6', '1', 'nightly']
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we drop the CI for Julia < 1.6, then it's better to change julia = "1.3" in the [compat] section in Project.toml as well

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay 👍🏻 ,Is it alright that I am changing version to 0.26.0, assuming it's kind of breaking?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If so, it might be a good idea to merge #1011 and perhaps #1027 for 0.26

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I merge this first and then see what could be done about #1011 and #1027? After all that is done, then release?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also I again don't have merge rights here and for good reasons 🤣

@johnnychen94
Copy link
Member

I'm okay to have ImageBinarization in Images, but since I'm not working actively here, it's better for others to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants