Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify 2F_85 and 2F_140 link names #67

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

karanchahal
Copy link

@karanchahal karanchahal commented Sep 26, 2024

Unification change name.

Hope to fix #66

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.26%. Comparing base (743d20f) to head (129dac7).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            main      #67       +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   0.00%   40.26%   +40.26%     
==========================================
  Files          5       20       +15     
  Lines        352      524      +172     
  Branches       0       33       +33     
==========================================
+ Hits           0      211      +211     
+ Misses       352      308       -44     
- Partials       0        5        +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 40.26% <ø> (+40.26%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@

<!-- Joint interfaces -->
<!-- With Gazebo or Hardware, they handle mimic joints, so we only need this command interface activated -->
<joint name="${prefix}robotiq_85_left_knuckle_joint">
<joint name="${prefix}left_knuckle_joint">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes would break existing setups, right? Should we update the default prefix value to robotiq_85_?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Naming convention between 2F-85 and 2F-140 different
2 participants