route error fix #18
route error fix #18
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve the deletion of an existing API implementation in Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (2)
51-56: Enhance health check endpoint with database connectivity status.Consider adding database connectivity check to provide more comprehensive health status.
app.get("/health", async(c) => { + let dbStatus = "healthy"; + try { + await prisma.$queryRaw`SELECT 1`; + } catch (error) { + dbStatus = "unhealthy"; + } + return c.json({ message:"i am alive", - status:200 + status: 200, + database: dbStatus, + timestamp: new Date().toISOString() }); });
58-61: Consider adding TypeScript types for request/response handling.Add type safety to your API handlers to catch potential issues at compile time.
+import { Context } from 'hono' + +interface User { + id: string + name: string +} + +type ApiResponse<T> = { + data?: T + error?: string +} + export const GET = handle(app); export const POST = handle(app); export const PATCH = handle(app); export const DELETE = handle(app);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/api/app/api/[...route]/route.ts(0 hunks)apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/api/app/api/[...route]/route.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts (2)
6-12: LGTM! Test case looks good.
The test case correctly verifies the health endpoint's response status and body.
3-3: Verify the impact of optional catch-all routing.
The change from [...route] to [[...route]] makes the route parameters optional. While this might fix the immediate routing error, please ensure this aligns with the API's intended behavior, as it could potentially allow unintended route matches.
✅ Verification successful
The routing change is safe and correctly implemented
The codebase inspection shows that:
- The API uses Hono framework with explicit route paths (
/hello,/health) - No route parameters are used in any handlers
- The double brackets
[[...route]]in the file path are part of Next.js file-system routing but don't affect the actual API implementation - The test cases verify exact path matches
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any route handlers that expect specific parameters
# and might break with optional routing
# Look for route parameter usage in the new route file
rg -A 5 'params\.' 'apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts'
# Look for route definitions that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'app.$_(path: $_)'
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to understand the routing implementation
# First, let's see the content of the route file
cat 'apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts'
# Also check the test file to understand the test cases
cat 'apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts'
# Look for any route definitions using Hono's syntax
rg -l "app\.(get|post|put|delete|all|on)\s*\("
Length of output: 1634
apps/api/app/api/[[...route]]/route.ts (1)
1-61: Verify API backward compatibility.
Since this is a route error fix, we should ensure that existing clients won't be affected by these changes.
✅ Verification successful
API changes maintain backward compatibility
The verification shows that the API implementation maintains backward compatibility:
- The
/api/healthendpoint's response format matches the test expectations - The
/api/helloendpoint is used by the frontend and follows RESTful patterns - No breaking changes are introduced to the existing endpoints' structure or response format
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint usage patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for API endpoint usage patterns..."
rg -l "\/api\/hello|\/api\/health" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for fetch/axios calls that might be affected
echo "Searching for HTTP client calls..."
rg -l "fetch\(.*\/api\/|axios\(.*\/api\/" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint usage patterns without escape sequences
echo "Searching for API endpoint usage patterns..."
rg -l "/api/hello|/api/health" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for fetch/axios calls that might be affected
echo "Searching for HTTP client calls..."
rg "fetch\(['\"].*?/api/|axios\(['\"].*?/api/" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for any other potential API route handlers
echo "Searching for other route handlers..."
rg -l "export const (GET|POST|PATCH|DELETE) =" --type ts
Length of output: 544
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint usage patterns without file type restrictions
echo "Searching for API endpoint usage patterns..."
rg -l "/api/hello|/api/health"
# Search for fetch/axios calls that might be affected
echo "Searching for HTTP client calls..."
rg "fetch\(['\"].*?/api/|axios\(['\"].*?/api/"
# Look for any API-related tests
echo "Searching for API tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.js -e spec.js
# Check package.json files for potential API dependencies or scripts
echo "Checking package.json files..."
fd package.json --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5388
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file and page component that use these endpoints
echo "Content of hello.test.ts:"
cat apps/api/tests/hello.test.ts
echo -e "\nContent of page.tsx:"
cat apps/api/app/page.tsx
# Check if there are any other API routes in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for other API routes:"
fd route.ts
Length of output: 1130
| .delete( async(c) => { | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: "2", | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test | ||
| }); | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Remove hardcoded ID and add proper error handling in DELETE endpoint.
Similar to the PATCH endpoint, this uses a hardcoded ID and lacks error handling.
-app.delete( async(c) => {
+app.delete("/:id", async (c) => {
+ const id = c.req.param('id')
+
+ try {
const test = await prisma.user.delete({
where: {
- id: "2",
+ id: id,
}
})
return c.json({
- test
+ data: test
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error.code === 'P2025') {
+ return c.json({ error: "User not found" }, 404)
+ }
+ throw error
+ }
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .delete( async(c) => { | |
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | |
| where: { | |
| id: "2", | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .delete("/:id", async (c) => { | |
| const id = c.req.param('id') | |
| try { | |
| const test = await prisma.user.delete({ | |
| where: { | |
| id: id, | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| return c.json({ | |
| data: test | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (error.code === 'P2025') { | |
| return c.json({ error: "User not found" }, 404) | |
| } | |
| throw error | |
| } | |
| }) |
| .post(async(c) => { | ||
| const body = await c.req.json() | ||
| console.log(body) | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.create({ | ||
| data: body | ||
| }) | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation and error handling for POST endpoint.
The endpoint lacks input validation and proper error handling.
app.post(async(c) => {
const body = await c.req.json()
- console.log(body)
+
+ if (!body?.name || typeof body.name !== 'string') {
+ return c.json({ error: "Invalid user data" }, 400)
+ }
+
const test = await prisma.user.create({
data: body
})
return c.json({
- test
+ data: test
});
});| app.get("/hello",async(c) => { | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.findMany() | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test | ||
| }); | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add pagination and response type safety for GET /hello endpoint.
The endpoint returns all users without pagination, which could cause performance issues with large datasets.
-app.get("/hello",async(c) => {
+app.get("/hello", async (c) => {
+ const { page = 1, limit = 10 } = c.req.query();
const test = await prisma.user.findMany({
+ take: Number(limit),
+ skip: (Number(page) - 1) * Number(limit),
+ select: {
+ id: true,
+ name: true,
+ // Add other fields you want to expose
+ }
})
return c.json({
- test
+ data: test,
+ page: Number(page),
+ limit: Number(limit)
});
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.get("/hello",async(c) => { | |
| const test = await prisma.user.findMany() | |
| return c.json({ | |
| test | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| app.get("/hello", async (c) => { | |
| const { page = 1, limit = 10 } = c.req.query(); | |
| const test = await prisma.user.findMany({ | |
| take: Number(limit), | |
| skip: (Number(page) - 1) * Number(limit), | |
| select: { | |
| id: true, | |
| name: true, | |
| // Add other fields you want to expose | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| return c.json({ | |
| data: test, | |
| page: Number(page), | |
| limit: Number(limit) | |
| }); | |
| }) |
| import { prisma } from "@repo/db"; | ||
| import { Hono } from "hono"; | ||
| import { handle } from "hono/vercel"; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| export const runtime = "nodejs"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const app = new Hono().basePath("/api"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add database connection error handling.
Consider adding error handling for the Prisma client initialization to gracefully handle database connection issues.
import { prisma } from "@repo/db";
import { Hono } from "hono";
import { handle } from "hono/vercel";
+
+// Middleware to handle database connection errors
+app.use("*", async (c, next) => {
+ try {
+ await next()
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error instanceof PrismaClientKnownRequestError) {
+ return c.json({ error: "Database error occurred" }, 503)
+ }
+ throw error
+ }
+})Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| .patch( async(c) => { | ||
| const name = await c.req.json() | ||
| const test = await prisma.user.update({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: "123", | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| name:name.name | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| return c.json({ | ||
| test | ||
| }); | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Remove hardcoded ID and add proper error handling in PATCH endpoint.
The endpoint uses a hardcoded ID and lacks proper input validation.
-app.patch( async(c) => {
+app.patch("/:id", async (c) => {
const name = await c.req.json()
+ const id = c.req.param('id')
+
+ if (!name?.name || typeof name.name !== 'string') {
+ return c.json({ error: "Invalid name provided" }, 400)
+ }
+
const test = await prisma.user.update({
where: {
- id: "123",
+ id: id,
},
data: {
name:name.name
}
})
return c.json({
- test
+ data: test
});
})Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests