-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CM] Add more logging for easier debugging #1645
[CM] Add more logging for easier debugging #1645
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1645 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.07% 88.07%
=======================================
Files 108 108
Lines 10023 10049 +26
Branches 892 894 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 8828 8851 +23
- Misses 876 878 +2
- Partials 319 320 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor comments. LGTM, thanks
Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <christophfroehlich@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
generally looks ok, just one question about the string concatenation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bmagyar How about something like this? Reserving some memory ahead it is better right?. Any other suggestions are welcome
don't you also need |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not applying the same logic to the activate/deactivate list?
Well as they are in the non-RT thread, I thought it might not be needed 😅😅 |
Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <christophfroehlich@users.noreply.github.com>
OK this is an argument, haven't checked this but only the diff in the UI 😇 |
Applied your suggestions :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Hello!
In our tests, we found it difficult with some missing important logs in some places. It would be really interesting to have them upstream.
read
andwrite
cycle, it is deactivated and the controllers that use the interfaces are also deactivated but no log is printed, so checking always with the CLI is a bit cumbersome.This is needed because when we communicate from some applications without using the spawner it would be interesting to know from the logs.
The following are the prints reported from the tests: